It has seemed like that at times. :) I have successfully replaced Raritan more than any other enterprise brand of KVM.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:38 AM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote: > “As for what to avoid, I have successfully avoided Raritan for years.” > > > > LOL They chase you or something, ASB? > > > > *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:27 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: KVM switch > > > > Another solid vote for Avocent. > > > > I've had one at home for 9 years now, and the ones that I've deployed at > various organizations have been rock solid. > > > > As for what to avoid, I have successfully avoided Raritan for years. > > > -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Glen Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looking for recommendations for a replacement system. > > Need USB and PS2 connectivity. One local user and one IP user. Up to 32 > servers. > > Don’t need serial or power control. > > I’d prefer cat5/6 cabling from the box to the servers to reduce cable > clutter in the 2 racks. > > My biggest concern is good IP control. I’ve been burned once, bought a > StarView box that added IP/VNC control to an existing KVM system and it was > horrible. > > It would drop connections, screens weren’t clear and it was just no fun > using it. > > So what brands/models would you recommend or not recommend? > > Thanks > > Glen. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
