I would buy it, park it at godaddy and forward it to our main site. I wish I could buy the .com version of our main domain of which we own .org and .net, that would be cool but they want $2800 for it, so screw that, we dont need it that bad. We are a .org anyway. ----- Original Message ----- From: Sean Martin To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Any insight for me?
That's a good point. We own most of the iterations of our primary domain (.com, .net, .coop, .org, .biz, etc.) for that very reason. We just redirect them to our primary site. - Sean On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> wrote: +1. I’ll also say $800 is pretty cheap for a domain resale. I sold one I had registered for a small biz for significantly more than that. For $800 I suspect it would be worth it just to keep from potentially polluting your public name on on the interweb. -sc From: Blackman, Woody [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Any insight for me? I agree with Sean, unless you have a driving need it is just an extra complication. However, I think having the .NET domain is useful to differentiate Intra/Extranet services (portals/partners). Low cost with high value for providing process design clarity. From: Sean Martin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 12:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Any insight for me? There's no need for a public domain name internally. If you're going to go through the trouble of changing it (which I have no personal experience with) just use something like .local. It sounds like the availability of the public domain name is your driving force behind this idea. If you're not experiencing any issues with your current configuration, and it's not preventing you from any future changes, I'd say leave it alone. We operate a split dns environment and it works just fine. YMMV - Sean On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: All, I have an interesting situation that has presented a need for a decision: I work for a medium sized company of around 250 people in three countries - US HQ, and much smaller offices in England and Australia. We have the .com domain for our company, but since joining the firm some years ago another company had the .net domain. I recently checked, and found that the .net domain is for sale - at nearly $800.00. That's pretty steep, but I'm considering recommending that we get it. We currently use our .com domain both internally and externally, with a split brain DNS, but I wouldn't mind at all using the .net domain internally. I believe that to fully implement the .net domain internally would require a domain rename, and we do use Exchange 2003, with a DC and an Exchange server in each office (2 DCs in the US office, one virtualized.) So, what are your thoughts on this? How much pain would be involved in making such a transition, and do you think it would be worth the effort? What (aside from not needing a split-brain DNS) would be the benefits, if any? Thanks, Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
