I happen to know the people at Raxco for more than 20 years, and I'm sure their
tests are not falsified. You should check out the graphs and form your own 
opinion.

Warm regards,


Stu Sjouwerman
Co-Founder, Publisher, Sunbelt Media
P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
F: +1-727-562-5199
[email protected]




From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag VM's

I concur...
-sc

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag VM's

Agreed. At least Scott (not a Raxco employee) says "I remain cautiously 
optimistic of the value of guest defragmentation.  I think the exchange of 
small IO for large IO is indisputably a Good Thing.  However, virtual 
environments are very complex and I harbor some concerns about guest 
defragmentation in virtual environments that must be considered".

And the comments are also a worthwhile read.

Dave

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 8:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag VM's

I hadn't, and I'm not suggesting it's wrong, but I wish it was somebody besides 
a company who happens to have a disk de-fragmenting product to sell that came 
to the conclusion.

-sc

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 11:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag VM's

Have you guys seen this?
http://vpivot.com/2010/04/14/windows-guest-defragmentation-take-two/
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764


















...

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to