You can deploy Exchange 2010 a couple of different ways.
The traditional way, with RAID, assumes you will continue to execute regular 
backups. Since Exchange 2010’s I/O requirements is 90% LESS THAN that of 
Exchange 2003, it’s arguable whether you need to separate log and database 
files. For disk recommendations, download the mailbox calculator (you can find 
links at msexchangeteam.com).
The non-traditional way assumes that you replicate your data to a backup server 
and then to a lagged backup server. So you have just as many COPIES of the 
data, just in different formats that enhance recoverability.
You can easily put 900 users on a single server with all roles; especially if 
concurrency is very low.
Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Tom Miller [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange server recommentations

Sorry, I knew I forgot something:

currently t1 to each location from HQ.  Will be increased 3x once we move to 
Metro Ethernet.

Total mailboxes:  900, 20% have little if any activity

Also, does MS still recommend separate RAID configurations for the logs files 
and database files (at least for HQ servers)?

Tom

>>> "Michael B. Smith" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>> 5/3/2010 10:49 AM >>>
What’s the total number of mailboxes and what kind of connectivity is available 
to the field sites?
Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Tom Miller [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange server recommentations

Hi Folks,

I currently run a non-Exchange shop.  There is talk of moving to Exchange.  
Fine by me, whatever works...  It's been a while since I worked with Exchange 
last (Exchange 2000).

Anyone care to provide some general hardware recommendations for the following:

field sites, 10-40 staff per location.
HQ site, about 600 staff.  I currently split the staff accounts onto two 
servers.

Currently each field site has it's own server, but I might go with XenApp for 
Outlook, then I wouldn't have to purchase new hardware, since those servers are 
mostly 32-bit.

Our current mail system hardly uses any memory but I'm sure Exchange would use 
more.

Tom


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.










Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to