Do you actually believe they will leave a good product alone? Go with something other than PGP unless you are not going to be updating it then it will be safe to use.
Jon On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Ziots, Edward <[email protected]> wrote: > I think based on the flexibility of encryption Options and some of the > items, you might want to look at the PGP Universal Suite of Products. I just > hope that Symantec doesn’t screw it up. > > > > Z > > > > Edward Ziots > > CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA > > Network Engineer > > Lifespan Organization > > 401-639-3505 > > [email protected] > > > > *From:* Chris Blair [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 04, 2010 12:06 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Encryption > > > > First off, we are running a Windows 2003 Native Active Directory. There are > no plans, or funds to move up to 2008. > > > > We have an upcoming project that will require a location on our file server > that encrypts folders and documents stored there. This project could last > only a year, or up to 5, all depends on its success. The files will be > uploaded from Outside customers, either via VPN or SFTP. > > > > I am looking at EFS, True Crypt or PGP. > > > > Anyone have opinions on which to use and why? > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
