Anyone else getting this when they try to goto Sunbelt's Message of the
Day (May 7th) from within Vipre?
The web site you are accessing has experienced an unexpected error.
Please contact the website administrator.
The following information is meant for the website developer for
debugging purposes.
Error Occurred While Processing Request
Error Executing Database Query.
[Macromedia][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]Invalid object name
'munchkin_links'.
The error occurred in D:\inetpub\wwwroot\app_2008_vars.cfm: line 281
Called from D:\inetpub\wwwroot\app_2008_vars.cfm: line 1
Called from D:\inetpub\wwwroot\Application.cfm: line 21
Called from D:\inetpub\wwwroot\app_2008_vars.cfm: line 281
Called from D:\inetpub\wwwroot\app_2008_vars.cfm: line 1
Called from D:\inetpub\wwwroot\Application.cfm: line 21
279 : </cfquery>
280 : <!--- Marketo: Munchkin code + links --->
281 : <cfquery datasource='sunbelt' name='master_munchkin_links'
cachedwithin='#master_cache_timespan#'>
282 : select * from munchkin_links where active = 1
283 : </cfquery>
________________________________
SQLSTATE
42S02
SQL
select * from munchkin_links where active = 1
VENDORERRORCODE
208
DATASOURCE
sunbelt
Resources:
Check the ColdFusion documentation
<http://www.macromedia.com/go/proddoc_getdoc> to verify that you are
using the correct syntax.
Search the Knowledge Base
<http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/> to find a solution to
your problem.
Browser
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
.NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET
CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Remote Address
XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
Referrer
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/MOTD/401/?license=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
&version=3.1.3121.0
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/MOTD/401/?license=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X&version=3.1.3121.0>
Date/Time
10-May-10 09:25 AM
________________________________
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 6:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Computers becoming unresponsive accross entire network.
Or something that ensures that no more than 75% of remaining CPU will
ever be consumed by the AV app and its processes...
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Alex Eckelberry
<[email protected]> wrote:
> And yes, we do test each definition that go out. The problem
with this one was
> that the loop condition kicks in on a file of a certain size
that is not in our test bed.
Would it be feasible to build some kind of governor into the
scan-engine, such that if a scan on a single file takes more
than a
given amount of CPU time, the scan is assumed to have gone
haywire,
and will be throttled or killed? With suitable administrator
alerts,
of course.
-- Ben
.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
