That's pretty hard to say without knowing the expected load on the system, as 
well as the expectations of the business with regards to performance and 
availability.  

 

If you want to go all-out, connect up that other array and split everything out 
per the link I sent in my previous message.  That may be overkill...or it may 
provide expected performance.   Depends on the situation.

 

If you aren't sure, you could stand it up as-designed and plan to use that 2nd 
array for future performance enhancements if necessary.

 

Jim

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

 

"Given the number of disks..."  Do you think I don't have enough?  I can chain 
another array with same number of disks and space.  (I have the equipment)

 

BF

 

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

 

Agree, maybe just mirror the backup volume, and the extra drive can be a hot 
spare if your raid/cabinet support that feature ?

 

Erik Goldoff

IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

'  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '

From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

 

Bob,

Given the number of disks you have to work with - that is probably the config I 
would use.  

 

My only 'concern' would be performance of the RAID5 for backups - RAID5 isn't 
optimal for write-intensive applications.  

 

But...unless you can scare up another disk so you can go 0+1 for the backups, 
or maybe go with a RAID1 for backups and leave one drive as a hot spare (if 
that gives you enough capacity) - I'd say your config is pretty decent.

 

Btw...some decent advice on this site if you want to really segment your 
databases and go all-out to optimize the SQL performance:  
http://www.sharepointjoel.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=0cd1a63d-183c-4fc2-8320-ba5369008acb&ID=227

 

 

 

 

Jim Holmgren

Manager of Server Engineering

XLHealth Corporation

The Warehouse at Camden Yards

351 West Camden Street, Suite 100

Baltimore, MD 21201 

410.625.2200 (main)

443.524.8573 (direct)

443-506.2400 (cell)

www.xlhealth.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

 

I am designing my SQL server for a SharePoint farm.  I have an iSCSI array with 
15 - 420GB SAS drives.  I want to use the array to house the transaction logs, 
database and backups.

 

My thought is to use two drives in a RAID1 for the transaction logs (420GB), 
Three drives in a RAID5 for the DB Backups (837GB) and Ten drives in a RAID 10 
for the database (2TB).  The server will be backed up by DPM, so the DB Backups 
volume won't need to hold but a day or two of backups.

 

Any SQL gurus see a problem with this setup?

 

BF

 

 

 

 


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including attachments, is for the sole use 
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or protected 
health information. Under the Federal Law (HIPAA), the intended recipient is 
obligated to keep this information secure and confidential. Any disclosure to 
third parties without authorization from the member of as permitted by law is 
prohibited and punishable under Federal Law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message. 

NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este mensaje incluyendo cualquier anejo es para uso 
exclusivo del (los) destinatario (s) y puede incluir información confidencial 
y/o información de salud protegida. La Ley Federal (HIPAA) establece que el 
destinatario está obligado a mantener la información confidencial y sequra. 
HIPAA prohíbe y castiga cualquier divulgación a terceras personas sin 
autorización del afiliado o permitido por ley. Si usted no es el destinatario, 
redirija esta mensaje al remitente, y destruye cualquier copia existente del 
mensaje original. 

 

 

 

 


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including attachments, is for the sole use 
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or protected 
health information. Under the Federal Law (HIPAA), the intended recipient is 
obligated to keep this information secure and confidential. Any disclosure to 
third parties without authorization from the member of as permitted by law is 
prohibited and punishable under Federal Law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message.

NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este facsímile, incluyendo lo adjunto, es para el uso 
exclusivo del destinatario(s) y puede contener información confidencial y/o 
información protegida de salud. En virtud de la Ley Federal (HIPAA), el 
destinatario tiene la obligación de mantener esta información segura y 
confidencial. Cualquier divulgación a terceros sin la autorización de los 
miembros de lo permitido por la ley está prohibido y penado en virtud de la Ley 
Federal. Si usted no es el destinatario, por favor, póngase en contacto con el 
remitente por teléfono y destruir todas las copias del mensaje original
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to