+1 But, assuming OP has one local disk attached via 3gbps SATA II, and havsa single SATA II disk in a SAN (also connected at 3gbs) then the 1gbps network would probably be the bottleneck.
Cheers Ken -----Original Message----- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 1:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Which is faster: iSCSI to Windows box over 1Gb or local SATA storage with intel ICH9? That's not a simple question to answer. You left out several major implementation details in the form of the hardware and software configuration of the storage box. It might be faster. It might be slower. It might be the same. On 5/15/2010 10:14 PM, justino garcia wrote: > Which is faster: iSCSI to Windows box over 1Gb or local SATA storage > with intel ICH9? > Is local storage faster, or is Network file based storage faster? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
