50GB is what I use as well, for the C: on virtual systems. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:56 AM, James Rankin <[email protected]> wrote: > We're using 50GB c: partitions for our Windows 2008 R2 Citrix XenApp 6 > servers. They haven't hit any problems with disk space yet > > > On 8 June 2010 03:40, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Even 20GB is too small. Aim for 40-50GB. If you are even thinking >> > of upgrading to Win2k8 then 72GB would be my minimum >> >> 72 GB for the C: partition.... >> >> I haven't really played with 2008 yet. What in %DEITY%'s name is on >> there that needs that much space? :) >> >> I was thinking of going with 2008 R2 Enterprise, in a host plus four >> VM config, for our next server upgrade cycle. Going with your >> recommendation, I can expect to have to dedicate 360 gigabytes of disk >> just to C: partitions. >> >> I think we have around 300 GB of corporate data total, not including >> Exchange! :-) >> >> -- Ben >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> > > > > -- > "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into > the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able > rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such > a question." > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
