I understand that. The previous poster's assertion was that Apple was guilty for choosing AT&T. I'm saying that every major phone maker also uses AT&T and are just as guilty by that logic. It's kind of like saying that you chose Bank X, and then Bank X had a website problem that exposed your personal information; you are therefore as guilty as Bank X because you chose them.
________________________________ From: Jay Dale [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AT&T/iPad security breach Apparently it targeted only IPad's based upon the ICC-IDs of the devices. So in essence, the target was through AT&T focused on IPads, and geared towards capturing the email information of A-Listers who would be getting the device sooner than the general public. Wouldn't be surprised if it were an inside job. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 12:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AT&T/iPad security breach By that rationale, everyone that offers a phone for AT&T is guilty of a security lapse. That would be, well, everybody, right? ________________________________ From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: AT&T/iPad security breach Good question, but both really... It appears to be an AT&T breach, but as you know it specifically effects the iPad. But, I beleive Apple fails here as well for he provider that they chose to host thier equipment and services with. -- ME2 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Rod Trent <[email protected]> wrote: iPad or AT&T? From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:20 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: AT&T/iPad security breach No doubt. It was pre-destined to be a major target. -- ME2 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Don Guyer <[email protected]> wrote: Only a matter of time, no shock there. Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 [email protected] From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 12:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: AT&T/iPad security breach http://www.google.com/search?q=ipad+security+breach -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
