I understand that.  The previous poster's assertion was that Apple was
guilty for choosing AT&T.  I'm saying that every major phone maker also
uses AT&T and are just as guilty by that logic.  It's kind of like
saying that you chose Bank X, and then Bank X had a website problem that
exposed your personal information; you are therefore as guilty as Bank X
because you chose them.

________________________________

From: Jay Dale [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AT&T/iPad security breach



Apparently it targeted only IPad's based upon the ICC-IDs of the
devices.  So in essence, the target was through AT&T focused on IPads,
and geared towards capturing the email information of A-Listers who
would be getting the device sooner than the general public.  

 

Wouldn't be surprised if it were an inside job.

 

Jay Dale

I.T. Manager, 3GiG

Mobile: 713.299.2541

Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may
contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail
and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this
message.

 

 

From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 12:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AT&T/iPad security breach

 

By that rationale, everyone that offers a phone for AT&T is guilty of a
security lapse.  That would be, well, everybody, right?

 

________________________________

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AT&T/iPad security breach

Good question, but both really...    It appears to be an AT&T breach,
but as you know it specifically effects the iPad.

 

But, I beleive Apple fails here as well for he provider that they chose
to host thier equipment and services with.

--
ME2



On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Rod Trent <[email protected]>
wrote:

iPad or AT&T?

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:20 PM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Re: AT&T/iPad security breach 

 

No doubt.  It was pre-destined to be a major target.

--
ME2

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Don Guyer <[email protected]>
wrote:

Only a matter of time, no shock there.

 

Don Guyer

Systems Engineer - Information Services

Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group

431 W. Lancaster Avenue

Devon, PA 19333

Direct: (610) 993-3299

Fax: (610) 650-5306

[email protected]

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 12:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: AT&T/iPad security breach

 

http://www.google.com/search?q=ipad+security+breach

--
ME2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to