Well, we have 1 Terego connection left and I am looking at getting rid of that as well. A year ago, I had 6 Terego lines and they were BRUTAL to deal with. Their customer service was terrible and when you needed something repaired it took quite a while. It was always a fight with them. Now, having said that...when the service worked, it worked ok. Weather was also a factor <regardless of what they say>. When they were World Without Wire they were great, but since they got bought out.........
Just my .02, but I would never recommend them to anyone. On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Stefan Jafs <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes I'm in Richmond Hill and my provider have a 100 Meg Bell connection > down to 151 Front St. > I'm thinking of going with TeraGo, they use their own backbone not relying > on Bell. > > Stefan > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Cameron <[email protected]>wrote: > >> You must be hooked to Bell, I'm having the same issues with a site in >> Concord. Our connection there has been brutal since the 15th. They are >> blaming their core switches and the bandwidth being taken up by the Soccer. >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Stefan Jafs <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> We currently have a 10Mbps /10 Mbps Internet connection, we have had some >>> down time in the last few days, and the carrier is blaming it on the G8/G20 >>> Summit (I'm in Toronto) and Soccer. Anyhow I'm thinking about having an >>> other redundant Internet connection, what's the best way to accomplish this, >>> preferably automatically. >>> >>> Internet browsing is relatively easy to switch pats in my Router if 1 >>> connection goes down but how about Mail and our web site, since these are >>> incoming connections. >>> >>> Any ideas? >>> >>> -- >>> Stefan Jafs >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Stefan Jafs > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
