It just seems counter intuitive that I do not need to assign static addresses on my routers, but I do on a DHCP server. It receives multicast addresses, and it should respond to multicast addresses... it's assigned address shouldn't matter (to me)
-----Original Message----- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 1:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: DHCPv6 Why? It's not any different from the static IP requirements in IPv4 networks. On 7/12/2010 9:18 PM, Jason Gauthier wrote: > Well, after diligence and testing... I've solved this. Windows 2008 > DHPCv6 will not work reliably without having a */_static_/* IPv6 > address assigned to it. > > I have not decided how I feel about that yet. -- Phil Brutsche [email protected] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
