WAY back when I first started working here, "servers" were regarded with 
awe as exotic and expensive machines.  We tried to get each one to do as 
many functions (different apps and services) as it could handle.

Once the price on servers started to creep down, developers began to 
specify that their application required a dedicated server.  Three racks 
later...

Virtualization has enabled the number of physical machines (thankfully our 
original machines which were now well beyond "clunker" status!) to come 
down.  Still, most run only one service.  The exception is web-based apps 
which can all run off a single web server.

As you have mentioned (and especially in a 7x24 shop like ours), having 
services on different servers does make it less likely one bad machine 
will take us down completely.
--
Richard D. McClary
Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group 
ASPCA®
1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36
Urbana, IL  61802
 
[email protected]
 
P: 217-337-9761
C: 217-417-1182
F: 217-337-9761
www.aspca.org
 
The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is 
from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA
®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may 
contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not 
the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this 
e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email 
and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any 
printout thereof.
 

"Holstrom, Don" <[email protected]> wrote on 07/19/2010 08:54:17 AM:

> I only have a hundred users. Been doing this for about 12 years. I 
> always thought it was better to have more or less one major server 
> per service. That way, if one of our services came down or needed 
> work, I wouldn?t be taking down the entire system. I have a buddy 
> with fewer users than me and he has 20+ servers. Some in the air 
> (virtual), some on the ground. I have seven servers running. Both of
> us host our web services at an outside firm. Both of us use 
> Exchange. An outside firm says we should go with only a couple of 
> servers. That sure would make things easier, but?
> 
> 
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to