And that is the "right choice" for you. And to the person who asked "how hard to support IE6?" - very. Very very very. It also has a limiting effect on what you can do to make your site better.
Steven On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Bill Songstad <[email protected]> wrote: > There's been a lot of good discussion in this thread and thanks to everyone > who chimed in. I have to agree with those who say 10% is too much to > irritate. And though they don't directly pay us through the website, the > info and articles we put there are some of the side benefits to the > things they do pay for. We are going to try to put out a campaign to get > them to upgrade by detecting their browser version, but as long as our > readership is above 4% IE6, leaving it to rot is off the table. My > apologies to my developer. > > Thanks everyone, > > -Bill > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Kennedy, Jim <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> The below is a VERY good idea. >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:18 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: Ammo request >> >> >> >> Worst case scenario, have the site check for browser versions. If it sees >> IE6, serve up stripped down content that is formatted to work properly, yet >> still contains the information needed. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
