I don't know what you have now, but I can tell you from experience at various client sites over the last year or so, none of the following was without issues : Trend, McAfee, Symantec SAV & SEP
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Carl Houseman <[email protected]>wrote: > For all of you staunch Vipre supporters, I'm just wondering, are you > still so staunch given the various false positives over the past year? It > seems like I remember reading here about one every quarter or so, and I can > confirm at least 3 since (from online records and messages I didn't delete) > since June 2009. And how many of you have had to deal with infections > despite having an up-to-date Vipre? > > > > Issue I'm debating is a switch from another product to Vipre, and even > though the price is very good, I'm looking at the Virusbtn RAP quadrant ( > http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/rap-index.xml) with a very poor showing for > "Sunbelt". Including the false positives and cost of switching, it doesn't > add up to a good choice. At least if the protection was much better, then > the occasional false positive might be justified. Is there any 3rd party > comparison or statistic that gives Vipre a better than average result? > > > > I'm not looking for endorsements or praise for their tech support – heard > that all before. But if you've had Vipre on 10 seats or more and have kept > track of live infections after a year or longer, and effort to avoid or > recover from false positives, that would be great to know. Please include > total number of seats in any report. > > > > Carl > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
