In 2008+, Conditional Forwarders are easier to manager. In 2003, Stub Zones are easier to manage. :)
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker> *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp <http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Webster <[email protected]> wrote: > sTubzones, not subzones. Either sTubzones or conditional forwarders will > work. In the Microsoft 2008 AD class, both are used when setting up a > trust > between 2 forests to show that both will work. I would prefer using > conditional forwarders. > > > Carl Webster > Citrix Technology Professional > Microsoft Certified Trainer > http://dabcc.com/Webster > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[email protected]] > > Subject: RE: Merging Departments > > > > After some googling, it appears that subzones won't work for me since > both > > A and B are directly under .ucdavis.edu. Correct? Wouldn't subzones > require > > that A was under B or B under A?I'm thinking that conditional forwarders > are > > the way to go. > > > > Curt > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Subject: RE: Merging Departments > > > > > > I'd use either stub zones or conditional forwarders to link the > > > internal DNS environments together. You are correct in that you have > split > > brain DNS. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brian Desmond > > > [email protected] > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
