Yeah, seriously.

Is it a flaw that should have been rectified earlier? Sure.

Is there response NOW what I would hope for? Yes.

I'd rather a company be willing to change posture for the better than
not.

-sc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:46 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Insecure Library Loading Vulnerability
> 
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Steven M. Caesare
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > For all of the bashing MS gets, I think it's good to see that
> > internally the security teams take the vuln notifications seriously
> > and were diligent in cooperating...
> 
>   Seriously?  As I mentioned earlier, Microsoft's software has been
criticized
> for its search path behavior for literally decades.  MS-DOS had this
problem
> and people pointed it out.  Microsoft waited until this started to be
seriously
> attacked before doing anything about it.
> They deserve condemnation on this one, not praise.
> 
> -- Ben
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to