We are looking at about 5 Tb, useable storage. Not sure what the OP is looking for. J I've been looking at this for about a year to 18 months now. just waiting on management to give me the OK to get serious.
John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 12:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN Storage Way cheaper cost than EMC , Netapp and Equalogic comparing apples to apples Licensing, after a set number of disks all systems are fully licensed with all features, all's you pay in the future is hardware costs when you want to expand Their Tiering and replay tech is far beyond what I've seen with the other vendors Upgrade costs are way cheaper since a new tray of disks benefit's the entire array and also all components are usable across all their hardware, no more forklift upgrades Their tech support is top notch, Ive called twice, barely been on the phone waiting and the person that answered was an actual engineer that helped me How big of a system do you need? If you are shopping around might as well make an informed decision J From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 12:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN Storage One thing that the HP rep I talked to pointed out, is that a lot of the perceived savings using tiered storage don't pan out because you don't really end up doing a lot of moving stuff from "hot" storage to "warm" storage. I know that in our environment, we don't have any virtual machines, etc so there's no need for "hot" storage, it'll all be "warm" storage. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN Storage I did briefly look at Compellent some time back. At the kind of size of business that we are I wasn't entirely clear what their key benefit was other than the storage tiering? There's a few vendors that fall into that category, Pillar being another one, where I look and think "I'm sure they make a nice SAN but what makes them stand out over XYZ?". From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 30 August 2010 16:52 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN Storage Take a looksee @ Compellent, we just replaced and EMC NS-20 with a Compellent Unit and we couldn't be happier. With their Tiered Tech we were able to get less Fiber and more Sata shelf's which saved us a bundle. Compared to EMC the Setup / management was breeze. I Dmotion'ed all the VM's live and had Zero downtime from SAN to SAN. From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN Storage Thanks Andy, one of the things that appeals about Lefthand and EQL is that all the licenses are included, whilst with Netapp/EMC the licenses for different things are additional, it's something I'll be keeping a close eye on when looking at figures/options. From: Andy Shook [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 30 August 2010 16:36 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN Storage Paul, I've got a considerable amount of Equallogic experience and one of the main reasons I chose them was that you get SAN-to-SAN replication for free. Along those same lines, watch the software\licensing costs as you compare solutions. As you license SAN protocols (NFS\CIFS\iSCSI, etc.) and features (replication.) the costs will climb. Also, I'm happy to refer you, or anyone, to a top-notch Dell channel VAR that I've worked with for about seven years. Shook From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SAN Storage Looking for a little feedback folks. We've got a SAN replacement coming up in a few months. We're pretty much a vmware shop except where a service has to run on a physical server (IO cards etc.). The vendors I'm primarily looking at are Lefthand, Equallogic and Netapp, and possibly EMC since Dell can quote on an EMC solution as well as Equallogic. I've not had quotes yet, but so far my instincts are leaning towards Netapp, mainly because of the things I keep hearing about NFS for vmware, as well as the fact they seem to offer a lot of flexibility whereas Lefthand and Equallogic offer iSCSI and, well yeah, they offer iSCSI. Be interested to hear any experiences, especially around vmware and replication between SANs at live/backup sites (not a live failover site but a "this will take a little work but we have a copy of the data that's an hour old" site). _____ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- You are currently subscribed to ntsysadmin as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/u?id=8142875.a9cf90b99baa17cb4fcf8293a59eb3b1&n=T&l=ntsysadmin&o=9079508 or send a blank email to leave-9079508-8142875.a9cf90b99baa17cb4fcf8293a59eb...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
