On different occasions, in different settings, I've done both of the things
you're suggesting here (plus the one you are afraid of.  <g>)

It all depends on your recovery time.  Your first option requires manual
intervention for failover.

Your second option is a little messy on all but the smallest of networks.

I'm actually using a combo of both of these options on the home network
currently  (fully overlapping scopes with conflict resolution PLUS weekly
backups of the scope to each local machine, copied to a central location)

Whichever of the two options you go for, should be a stopgap.  You really
want to go down the path that Brian and James have advocated.


*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker>
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle <[email protected]
> wrote:

>  Ok, here goes…
>
>
>
> Present environment - pure Windows 2003 AD, with two DCs. One is virtual
> (vmware esx 3.5), 2003 Enterprise Edition. The other is physical, 2003
> Standard Edition (not sure why – I didn’t set it up). Virtual DC is running
> DHCP for our entire organization, and would be a pain to go through and
> setup split scopes (many sites, multiple vlans per site, and thus, multiple
> DHCP scopes for each site.) A year ago, we were using Cisco devices at each
> remote site to handle DHCP for each subnet. We performed a major network
> overhaul and had to centralize, so here we are.
>
>
>
> I’ve now been tasked with building redundancy for our DHCP services. Moving
> to Server 2008 is not an option right now. We MAY be able to upgrade the
> 2003 Standard server to 2003 Enterprise, but that isn’t a given just yet.
>
>
>
> Issues…
>
>
>
> Can’t cluster, because of the Std Edition OS, (but even then, how would
> that impact AD & DNS?)
>
> Can’t backup from Primary and restore to Secondary, again, because of
> different OS (M$ says, “not supported” to backup from Enterprise and try to
> restore to Standard)
>
> As mentioned, split scopes would be a major admin pain (it wouldn’t be so
> bad if we had 2008, since there is a wizard in 2008, but I digress)
>
>
>
> So, the way I see it, I have a couple of options…
>
>
>
> Setup “secondary” as a “hot spare” but disable the DHCP service unless and
> until the primary becomes available. Use *netsh dhcp server export
> c:\dhcpdatabase.txt all *on a daily basis to ensure a valid “backup” of
> the primary, and copy that file over to the secondary as part of one
> scheduled task.
>
>
>
> -or-
>
>
>
> Setup secondary, authorize it, configure it, turn it on, (hear me out here)
> and setup IP Address Conflict Resolution at the server level on both
> servers, and let them “work it out” on their own. I realize that I wouldn’t
> have any lease synchronization, and that there is a slight risk of duplicate
> IP, but I can’t imagine there would be much. My WAN links are solid. Also,
> any scope or option changes made on the primary would have to be duplicated
> on the secondary…administrative overhead yes, but still less than dealing
> with split scope, IMO. Even then, couldn’t I just export from the primary
> after I’ve made changes and then import to the secondary? I know lease
> information is contained in the exported file…trying to decide whether or
> not that would be good or bad… if it wouldn’t be a problem, why not take it
> a step further and schedule an export/import from the primary to the
> secondary?
>
>
>
> What am I missing?
>
>
>
> Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
> Technology Coordinator
> Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA*
> *[email protected]*
> *www.eaglemds.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
> CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
> view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
> electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
> legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
> and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended
> recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete
> this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this
> message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on
> the information that it contains.
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to