Not this topic. The people of Latin decent in Wal-Mart one. 

I tried being reasonable on that one and kept it off-list. But that was the 
same tune off-list. 

Presentation and defense of subjective observations as viable facts. 

I should probably forward my initial off-list reply to the list lest folks 
think me incapable of diplomacy. 
 
WJR
 - from my Crackberry.

"If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck."

-----Original Message-----
From: "Steven M. Caesare" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:23:47 
To: NT System Admin Issues<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" 
<[email protected]>Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to 
unlock features already on your CPU

Off list??!?

 

That's no fun!

 

-sc

 

From: William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU

 

My "feelings" are that I'll either get another off-list email explaining
how I'm wrong, or he's got his head in the sand already and won't
respond.

 - WJR



On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:00, Miller, Michael
<[email protected]> wrote:

Let's talk about your feelings. :-)

 

From: William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:24 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU

 

Whatever.  You do this passive-aggressive arguing shit too often.  You
start off saying you weren't clear on your original point then you
proceed to defend a point  you patently have no understanding of, then
as what should become clearly your error, you either cease to reply to
the email thread, or you pull this let's agree to disagree bullshit.



If I could be coerced to give a damn I'd feel sorry for your pathetic,
closed-minded, delusional ass.  But I can't.  You're just pitiful.


 - WJR

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:19, John Aldrich
<[email protected]> wrote:

*shrug* This discussion has gone on for awhile and neither side is going
to
be able to sway the other. I see no need to drag it out and keep it
going
when we're just going to disagree. I've stated my position, I've tried
various examples to explain why I think it's a bad idea, and vice versa,
but
neither side has budged their position. Why drag it out and risk getting
hateful over it?

You're entitled to your opinion, I'm entitled to mine. We're both
entitled
to try and convince the other that they are wrong, but in the end, if we
can't convince each other, the best thing to do is agree to disagree.



From: William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:02 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU


Nice cop out.

 - WJR

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:56, John Aldrich
<[email protected]>
wrote:
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree.




-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU



-----Original Message-----
From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 8:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU

> Here's something I thought of... Sure you'll be able to buy an
"unlock"
> code, but will the end-user realize that they are getting the same
physical
> hardware as someone who pays more and know that they can unlock better
> performance? Thinking about the folks who go into Best Buy or WalMart
to
> buy a new computer (this appears to be the market that this new
"feature"
is
> aimed at.) My thought is that they're going to buy whatever is on the
shelf
> and not realize that they just need to buy an "upgrade"/unlock code to
enable
> better performance.
>
> How is that going to help the end-user?

As long as Walmart doesn't say that the CPU is Quad-Core, but neglect to
tell you that you have to pay extra.

If Walmart says that the CPU is dual core, 2GHz and supports VT, and it
costs $x, then why should anyone care that the CPU can do extra for
additional payment.

Cheers
Ken

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

________________________________

This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to