Very different model, actually.

 

-sc

 

From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU

 

I am reminded of a failed business model that was somewhat akin to this
"unlocking some hardware that you purchased". 

 

 

Divx.

 

 

 

 

Phillip Partipilo

Parametric Solutions Inc.

Jupiter, Florida

(561) 747-6107

 

 

From: Jeff Steward [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU

 

I am not an independent contractor/consultant and this makes sense to
me.  Of course, I also have 20+ years of manufacturing experience so
that may color my attitude.

 

You are given a choice of buying X performance now with the OPTION to
buy Y performance increase for an incremental cost IF you so desire.
How this is perceived as being a Bad Thing (tm) is beyond me.  There is
a value for performance and you get to decide where you want to play on
the price/performance curve.

 

If you want to hack the chip/mobo and turn on the extra performance and
perhaps risk some nebulous legal consequence or the very real "We (the
manufacturer) won't support that system" consequence, then go for it.

 

As others have already stated, setting up and operating a single
fabrication run makes a great deal of sense from a manufacturing
standpoint and this is where the bulk of the cost (after R&D) lies.
Intel and/or AMD will need to recoup those costs and you know that high
performance will always cost more.  Overall, reduced manufacturing costs
will lead to lower consumer costs provided we have competition in the
market.

 

Furthermore, as I noted in an earlier message, for some use cases being
able to add performance by writing a check and flipping a proverbial
switch without popping a box out of the rack has a great deal of appeal.
Convincing *my* CFO to write a check for X dollars is much easier than
getting him to write a check for 10X dollars, and I'll bet I'm not alone
there.

 

Of course, none of you have ever bought a server that was massively
overkill for your current needs "just in case" you needed more
performance down the road, right?  Imagine a world where you could buy
computing resources on demand and pay as we go?  Oh wait....

 

-Jeff Steward

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Phillip Partipilo <[email protected]>
wrote:

Call me out on this one if I am totally off my rocker, but why does it
seem that all the folks in this particular "debate" who are pro this
concept of artificial limitations seem to be independent
contractors/consultants?


Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107




-----Original Message-----
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU

It seems that's an advertising issue as opposed to a technical or "am I
being robbed" issue.

Given Intel's prowess in the market, I suspect if there's money to be
made with this model, they'll ensure it's effectively marketed.

Do you know the "Intel Inside" campaign? Can you see the logo in your
mind? Can you recognize the "Intel chimes" even if you don't see the
commercial?

I should think "Intel Inside PLUS!" shouldn't be too difficult.

-sc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 8:52 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU
>
> Here's something I thought of... Sure you'll be able to buy an
"unlock"
> code, but will the end-user realize that they are getting the same
physical
> hardware as someone who pays more and know that they can unlock better
> performance? Thinking about the folks who go into Best Buy or WalMart
to
> buy a new computer (this appears to be the market that this new
"feature" is
> aimed at.) My thought is that they're going to buy whatever is on the
shelf
> and not realize that they just need to buy an "upgrade"/unlock code to
> enable better performance.
>
> How is that going to help the end-user?
>
>
>
> From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 7:12 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU
>
> I disagree that the costs are being subsidized at the low end.  It
costs less
> overall to manage the product as a single unit with  unlockable
features than
> a two separate products with hard coded features.
> And since the primary competitor has still not embraced that model, it
is still
> possible for someone to compare the value of both the low end
processor
> and the high one independently.  I'll very that both levels of
consumer well
> get better pricing than before, even as Intel bags more profits.
> -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
> Sent from my Motorola Droid
> On Sep 21, 2010 6:00 PM, "Ben Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> But another way to l...
>  That works as long as no one can offer a comparable but lower-priced
> product.  If your price is high because your costs are high (living,
education,
> experience, etc.), chances are good you'll have continued work --
potential
> competitors will likely have similar costs.  If your price is high
while your costs
> are low, that's another matter.  If competition moves in, your
customer base
> is likely to defect en masse.
>  Even if you lower your prices to compete, you now have a reputation
as
> having a high price/cost ratio.  Customers often dislike that, and
express their
> dislike with their wallets.
>
>  Since legislative action is part of the big picture (with the
hardware thing),
> popular opinion can matter for that reason, too.
>
> >> High price/cost ratios tend to yield unstable long-term  economic
> >>relationships, unless presti...
>  They're only better for the customers who buy the product with the
lower
> price and get the lower intended performance.  The customers who pay
for
> more performance get a worse deal.  Both parties get  the same
physical
> material.  Both benefit from the same NRE.  But the high-end guys pay
> more.  They end up subsidizing the low-end guys.  Sometimes the
high-end
> people don't mind, but sometimes they do.  When people propose taxing
> the rich to give to the poor, the rich tend to put up a pretty big
stink, for
> example.
>
> > Frankly, I think that the hardware side of the house has suffered
with
> > low margins as compared ...
>  I agree completely.  But weren't you just making a point about the
scope of
> this discussion?  ;-)
>
> >>> I think you're arguing a narrower scope of issues than some other
> >>>people  are.
> >
> > Yes, I am...
>  Well, your choice, but don't be surprised when you get persistent
> confusion/disagreement.  One can "win" any argument by carefully
defining
> terms.  If mutual understanding is the goal, you need to change minds.
:)
>
> -- Ben
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> <http://www.sunbeltsof...
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-
> software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to