Why would you need to even consider software RAID?  The cheapest of
motherboards today supports RAID1.  It's like the de facto standard.


*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker>
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *



On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:32 AM, John Aldrich <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Good point. I was thinking that the general consensus of opinion was to
> shun
> software RAID, but I thought I'd double-check.
>
>
>
> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 10:19 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Small server
>
> I always prefer hardware raid to software.  I can’t speak for Dell, but
> with
> HP if the controller board goes bad you can replace it without losing the
> data on the RAID.  What happens if you lose your system disks on a software
> RAID system?
>
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:55 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Small server
>
> I am looking at getting a small server running Windows Server 2003, so I
> can
> have my time and attendance running on a supported O/S. Looking at Dell’s
> Premier site, the least expensive option only offers a Software RAID5,
> unless I’m mis-reading the options. Would you guys rather have a Hardware
> RAID0 / RAID1  or a software RAID5?
>
> Any other options I should be looking at for a small server? We’re
> primarily
> a Dell shop here, but I can look at others, including “white box” servers,
> so long as I can get some sort of warranty / hardware support on it.
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to