That would be an L2+ http://erlegreer.com/LOL/
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 5:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: 64 Bit flash beta 2 I enjoy reading your posts, Ben. That one brought a good chuckle... ASB On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Ben Scott <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On difference is that the working machine ALSO has a left-over 32 bit Flash > 10 Active X installation on it that I didn't remove. Makes perfect sense to me -- there are at least 4096 different ways which web designers detect Flash, and all of them are wrong. Someone's prolly looking for the GUID of the 32-bit version or something goofy like that. Linux users have been dealing with this for years. It's amazing how many websites think "not Microsoft Windows" means "Lynx on a ASR-33 teletype". -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
