> I would not use the 2824 as a router for anything serious, and >"bandwidth reasons" makes it sound serious.
Do you know what it takes to route even at gig speeds? It doesn't need to be serious at all to desire to route faster than most routers:) Its iSCSI traffic, letting even a 2824 pass it around is better than most options. > Use something else as the router. HP makes layer-3-and-higher >switches, but the 2800 series isn't one of them. Heh, not an option:( I just re-confirmed with an HP guy, as the switch process "connected" routes first than best match, any downstream user in client vlan can route traffic and jump vlans (stupid imho to make the order process this way, when it could do static first so a null/reject could actually be of use). Bah, in Linux we use one physical interface and tag a virtual int into a vlan. So I use one port for example. I am not that savvy with Windows, but I sure have never seen a way to do this with Windows drivers:( I guess I could bridge but that's just getting messy... jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
