Installation for me was pretty straightforward. I had no problem installing the 
Enterprise Console on the VM I created for it. 
 
I created a SCCM package for deployment on Friday, should be testing it Monday 
if nothing crazy interferes.  Running the command-line installer for the client 
worked fine and so far I've had 100% success with the Symantec removal.   
 
I did run into a problem with installing a separate Update Server, but that was 
my own fault for not reading the directions - if you don't install A before you 
install B - it won't work correctly and you'll get an error.
 
Documentation isn't the best I've ever read, but their KB is good and there are 
a lot of knowledgeable folks on their Support Forum.  There are two different 
"Install" documents.  There is a quick-start guide and there is a much more 
in-depth manual for installation.  The quick-start guide is lacking a lot of 
important detail for an enterprise roll-out.
 
I have 6 hours of consulting time that was included with the purchase, I'll 
probably use that for a health-check and review of my environment since I 
couldn't get a slot before 10/21 and I've committed to management to have the 
deployment completed by 10/31.
 
Jim
 

________________________________

From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sat 10/9/2010 3:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions



So the Sophos guys came in cheaper, but the Console Installer is actually now 
the buggiest app I use.

I experienced several issues during installation that weren't documented. Not 
looking good...
For those of you that use it, how was installation? It had all sorts of issues 
simply enumerating

usernames and the browser had bugs, sigh... What makes a software company 
release an app with

a list of "Known Problems" so long? How is that acceptable?

 

Thinking about not wanting more headaches than I have so I am going to demo 
Avira, but it was more

money.

 

jlc

 

From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions

 

Yup,

And FF is prohibitively expensive in small environments, but it is my favorite.
Most reliable I have ever used, _never_ had an FP or a dead machine or a bad 
dat. Its detection rates aren't quite as good as the top guys but you 
compromise I guess.

Right now, I am keen on Sophos for the multiplatform agent. Their console 
appears ok, it appears their agent is an exe so the method they use to install 
the agent by GPO is a startup scrip, not coolL

 

Avira has a Postfix compatible MTA product and a Squid compatible (by ICAP) 
product which is cool. I like how they don't distinguish clients (file servers 
vs. desktops in licensing terms). I have yet to see their console though.

 

Thanks for everything guys,

jlc

 

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 4:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AV Opinions

 

Or Vipre, because Joseph has already indicated that he's familiar with them.   
He's looking for other recommendations...


 

ASB
 

 

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Ryan Finnesey 
<[email protected]> wrote:

No one as commented on the Forefront products.

 

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 4:04 PM


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions

 

We thought their management sucked too.  Their SALES management, that is.  J

 

From: Ray [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions

 

We thought pretty much everything about their management sucked, including 
agents. 

 

From: Alan Davies [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 5:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions

 

Hmmm ... my comments were more around the ability to manage/control agents than 
how nice the console was to use.  Also, on the additional functionality side, 
their local FW and software NAC components were very immature feature wise.  
Support varied - UK support a million times better than the out of hours US 
support!

 

 

 

a

 

________________________________

From: Ray [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 07 October 2010 12:42
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions

That's interesting, because we absolutely hated McAfee and it's enterprise 
console, and couldn't wait to get rid of it.  We've ended up with significantly 
better coverage with Sophos than we ever did with McAfee. 

 

From: Alan Davies [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions

 

Sophos seem to be excellent detection wise.  As for not detecting Conficker 
below, that'll have been another issue as there is no AV product out there that 
can't detect it.  If I had to guess, perhaps one host was infected and locked 
out AD, but all the Sophos alerts were from machines missing MS08-067 that were 
"getting infected" because the OS could not protect against it, but immediately 
cleaned by Sophos.  Certainly behaviour I've seen before.  You must patch 
Windows, AV can do everything on its own.

 

One negative comment about Sophos - they are still, in my opinion, very low 
down the pecking order in Enterprise Management.  They have a long, long way to 
catch up on McAfee and the like for agent management, alerting, mandatory 
policies, etc.  You can work around these things and it's a great AV product, 
but if you're a large, sensitive environment, it may frustrate you a little.  
Going from 7 to 9 didn't improve these grumbles much ...

 

 

 

a

 

________________________________

From: Ames Matthew B [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 07 October 2010 08:12
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions

We run Sophos here, and it seems to do a reasonable job.  Corporate IS got 
caught last year with their pants down after a departmental server without any 
AV on it (or seriously out of date - guess someone got a good telling off for 
that) managed to get Conficker.  Given we don't have a direct net connection to 
our deskstops or services network, they had not bothered to install the 
hotfixes to prevent this

 

For what ever reason Sophos did not detected it, and quite a few machines got 
infected, and a couple of thousand user accounts got locked out.  Took them a 
few days to get things under control - I wrote a little ldap tool to monitor 
the number of locked out user accounts :-)

 

Sophos is a bit of a memory hog (not sure how it compares to other versions), 
taking around 150MB (savservice.exe alone is taking 108MB on my machine 
currently).  We are currently using 7.6.20

 

tht,

Matt

 

________________________________

From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 07 October 2010 01:23
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AV Opinions

Give Sophos a long look.  I firmly believe they are the best of breed that 
nobody seems to talk about.  They don't market to the non-corporate crowd, so 
that probably has something to do with it.  I asked this list and a few other 
resources when I was evaluating solutions.  I did not hear from a single person 
using Sophos that did not like it.

 

We are replacing Symantec with Sophos right now and it is going very well so 
far.   

 

Sophos will sync with AD (if you want) to automatically protect computers when 
you add them.  It will remove Symantec cleanly (so far on about 25 test/pilot 
users it has been perfect) when pushing it out.  It includes device control 
(want to block USB storage devices...2-3 clicks and you are done), a NAC 
component, and a firewall. 

 

It also includes clients for Mac/Linux and with each corporate license, you get 
a free at-home license.   NFI - just a very satisfied customer so far.

 

Jim

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wed 10/6/2010 7:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: AV Opinions

At one of the shops that I look after, I have been asked to change the AV to 
something new and current.

Vipre and Forefront excluded (I know enough about those already), what else are 
you guys using that's good?

 

It's been a while since I looked at all the other vendors, I have such little 
time to eval for this need, I can't just download all vendors packages and 
trial each one for 30 days, I need to look at one and hopefully get it rightL

 

Thanks for any opinions,

jlc

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including attachments, is for the sole use 
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or protected 
health information. Under the Federal Law (HIPAA), the intended recipient is 
obligated to keep this information secure and confidential. Any disclosure to 
third parties without authorization from the member of as permitted by law is 
prohibited and punishable under Federal Law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message.

NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este facsímile, incluyendo lo adjunto, es para el uso 
exclusivo del destinatario(s) y puede contener información confidencial y/o 
información protegida de salud. En virtud de la Ley Federal (HIPAA), el 
destinatario tiene la obligación de mantener esta información segura y 
confidencial. Cualquier divulgación a terceros sin la autorización de los 
miembros de lo permitido por la ley está prohibido y penado en virtud de la Ley 
Federal. Si usted no es el destinatario, por favor, póngase en contacto con el 
remitente por teléfono y destruir todas las copias del mensaje original
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to