FYI, NewEgg has a bunch of hardware on sale right now during their "48-hour sale" which ends in less than 12 hours... http://snipr.com/1b1cy6
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 2:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Home server system Will do. So far, the compatibility list looks okay to me... http://www.qnap.com/pro_compatibility.asp -ASB On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Eldridge, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: Andrew, I bought the 459 pro last night on amazon. It just has more power than the 419P. I am now looking at their (qnap.com/forums) to see what people are saying are the best drives for this model. The possible masking of certain stats from the green WD models is concerning. Let me know if you do which model you select and what drives? d From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Home server system I started comparing them this afternoon. Didn't look at the hardware compatibility lists yet. -ASB On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Eldridge, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: I had a co-worker who got the 459pro. He looked at the 419 but didnt like the HD compatibility list of the 419. So he went with the 459. Have you looked at both? dave From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Home server system Hey!! I'm looking at that and the TS-419 right now. :) So far, the reviews look very favorable, as does the price. -ASB On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Eldridge, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: ++ Slight diversion. Anyone used any NAS boxes from QNAP? In particular I am looking at the TS-459 pro for home use. From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 3:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Home server system Yeah, it's funny how quickly people at home start demanding SLAs and become intolerant of any downtime. :) -ASB On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Steven Peck <[email protected]> wrote: Mines been solid all this year. I found that for each system I have a user account created for it and that solved the password issue (since each system is mostly for one person it works out fine). I also use it as the print server for everyone so that is nice as well. While there are times when I like to play IT at home, in general I don't want to finagle and experiment with stuff that is protecting my families data/services or my customer (wife) gets irate. At work we have a separate lab, so at home I have a separate lab. :) On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: I ran Home Server for ~ 2 years on an HP Media Center PC. I understand it's based on Server 2003, dumbed down a bit. It mostly worked OK, but had some strange quirks - for instance, it would complain if the password on a PC was not the same as the user account on the server. It would still work, it just seemed to want to complain from time to time. It seemed to do a decent job of balancing its load over the various discs and was generally unobtrusive. There's a free utility available - Google for it - that would let you launch other programs from within the Server UI, so you could use the box for other things if you wished. The connector software between the individual PCs and the server was a bit flaky and I finally got tired of the nuisance. If all you want is backup, there are lots of free programs that will do that for you. Set up the server to share it's big drives and let each PC backup to it on a set schedule. YMMV On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:10 PM, James Rankin <[email protected]> wrote: My direct needs are for storage only, but I was wondering whether it would be a good idea to try and get some of the extra bells and whistles that Home Server or the like provides. As my kids get a bit older, obviously some of the backup and multimedia functionality that users can utilize would be nice...although there are always ways I could configure things like that myself, should I want to. I'm a bit undecided, but I've got plenty food for thought here....cheers... On 12 October 2010 15:50, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> wrote: What do you intend to do with this server besides provide storage? Your topic says server, but your comments imply NAS. Home Server seems okay, but I would think you could do just as well with a more direct configuration. I built a nice virtual host server for my home network for under $1500, and that was in 2008. Would be even less expensive to do today. -ASB On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:57 AM, James Rankin <[email protected]> wrote: Any recommendations for a reliable and hopefully fairly cheap server system for the home? One of my colleagues recommended the HP MediaSmart ex475 coupled with Windows Home Server, are there anything else people can recommend? Also, does Windows Home Server offer any particular software or benefits or is it just aimed at being simple for the non-technical user? I can see it has backup and remote access capabilities - I'm not really that bothered about the remote access features for sharing across the internet, but anything else is probably a plus. How much extra does the Home Server stuff give you when compared to some sort of baby NAS device like a TeraStation? I was hoping to be able to get something decent for under £1000, at the least. Storage, availability and backup are probably the primary concerns I'm addressing, but I'm open to all sorts of other features as well. I don't have masses of data at the moment, but I might start storing VM files on there for some testing purposes, so I'll probably need a wedge of capacity. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.{token} ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
