After a few years of dealing with IE Maintenance Policies, I've finally
gotten fed up dealing with their apparent "flakiness" in Citrix environments
where IE is launched as a published app. It wasn't until recently that I
found out there are known issues with certain policy settings applying
correctly in this scenario.

By flakiness, I'm referring to proxy settings, security zone and privacy
settings not applying correctly.

The issues being faced were recently brought to light when we migrated one
of our departments to a new roaming profile environment. We currently use
roaming profiles in a Citrix environment with multiple application silos.
This has led to many profile related issues mostly due to LWW scenarios.
We've deployed new policies so that users logging into each application silo
will access a specific profile for that silo.

Anyway, we wanted to be certain no lingering issues were brought into the
user's new profile so their old profiles were deleted. Upon their next
login, the migrated users had new profiles created. This highlighted the
issue where certain IE policy settings were not being applied correctly. I
worked with Microsoft for a couple of days and tried different solutions
(switching between preference mode and no preference mode), running a login
script with "runonce.exe /alternateshellstartup", etc. Nothing appears to be
working and RSOP shows no issues.

As a result of all this, I decided to put together my own .adm templates
with the relavant policy settings. My initial testing indicates everything
works perfectly. Although trusted sites are correctly configured, they do
not appear within the IE options dialogue, which is something I can live
with. Other than the additional overhead incurred whenever  a change needs
to be made, and possibly having to redo my .adm templates if newer versions
of IE change the locations of these settings, can anyone think of a reason
why I would not want to move forward with my custom policies? I'm sure
there's a reason the IE Maintenance Policies were created and behave the way
they do. I just want to be sure I'm not missing out on some important
aspect.

 - Sean

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to