I'm testing our Netscalers for load balancing our AD DNS. So far they're
working pretty well.

- Sean

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Free, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:

>  FWIW- If you consider that route, there are a number of players in the
> DNS/DHCP/IPAM appliance space, for example, multiple infoblox devices can be
> deployed in a HA “grid” that spans numerous locations.
>
>
>
> That’s not an indictment of Bluecat or an endorsement of infoblox, just an
> observation that there are a number of options.
>
>
>
> *From:* Ziots, Edward [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 19, 2011 6:10 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: RE: DHCP reservations explained...
>
>
>
> Then go with Bluecat Devices… if you want the HA with your DHCP.. We are
> doing that here with 2 Bluecat Appliances.
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward E. Ziots
>
> CISSP, Network +, Security +
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> Email:[email protected] <email%[email protected]>
>
> Cell:401-639-3505
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:38 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: RE: DHCP reservations explained...
>
>
>
> Right @ 100 servers. Haven't been burned, but I'm not thrilled about lack
> of true failover/redundancy in DHCP in W2k3.  80/20 doesn't cut it, IMHO.
>
> On Jan 18, 2011 2:34 PM, "David Lum" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1. For same reasons.
> >
> > Jonathan I'm guessing you've been burned by DHCP issues in the past, or
> have few enough servers it's not too inconvenient?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:16 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: DHCP reservations explained...
> >
> > I've always liked DHCP reservations over static IP addresses for servers
> where possible for ease of management
> > Single view of most servers from DHCP client list
> > simple to change parameters globally ( default gateway, primary DNS,
> secondary DNS, etc ) without having to visit each server
> > less likely to experience IP in use conflict from out of date tracking
> spreadsheets when adding new devices to the network
> > etc, etc, etc
> > but if your clients/applications use hostnames, then that's what I'd
> monitor for most checks, keeping a single/simple check using the IP address
> to cross verify against name resolution.
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM, David Lum <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>> wrote:
> > The other day someone commented that it seemed like a bit much that 50%
> of my 100-ish servers have DHCP reservations - driving home yesterday I
> realized another reason why I have it that way (because yes, I chew on these
> questions and constantly evaluate why I do some process or another) -
> because my fellow SE's have their server monitoring set up to look at
> specific IP's instead of hostnames and I am unable to convince them
> otherwise. If the server IP changes it hoses their tests and the
> dependencies.
> >
> > It's not how I set *MY* monitoring up for servers I maintain, but I have
> posted that question here in fact and have seen differing opinions on
> weather hostname or IP is preferred.
> > David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
> > NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
> > (Desk) 503.548.5229 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to