Yes, I've seen your knowledgebase... :-)

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> wrote:

> For that many sites, I'd like something else handle all the replication
> rather than scripts.
>
> And I really like scripting.
>
>
>  *ASB *(My Bio via About.Me <http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio>)
> *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
>
> *
> *
>
>
>
>   On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:12 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Or… Robocopy and scheduled tasks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:03 AM
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: File distribution with local peer to peer feature?
>>
>>
>>
>> Why not just get a cheap NAS for each location?
>>
>>
>>
>> If that seems to cost prohibitive for 50+ locations, why not install
>> Windows Live Sync (or DropBox, etc) on each of the machines under the same
>> account?   All files would be transfered to ALL sites whenever you put it on
>> a single machine.
>>
>>
>>
>> *ASB *(My Bio via About.Me <http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio>)
>> *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Durf <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all;
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a client who has multiple (50+) small sites with 2-10 PC's at each
>> site, most with no network file storage.   So far I have been distributing
>> small files to each site using FTP from their central webserver, and that
>> has been working fine for small files.  We're now investigating staging
>> larger files to these sites (100MB+, thanks Windows Live!) and utilizing a
>> cloud-based file depot for that purpose (Sharefile in this case).
>>
>>
>>
>> To minimize costs, I'd like if possible to utilize some sort of
>> peer-to-peer sync.  In an ideal world, I would only download one copy of the
>> file to one machine at a given site, and the other machines would then look
>> to the peer "file server" for the file.   In my ideal, the "file server"
>> would also be automagically selected, to prevent having to manually
>> designate a machine that may or may not be online at a given time.
>>
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know of a script or utility that would assist in this?  The
>> process would be something like:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Site receives request to sync FOO.EXE
>>
>> 2. Check local peers to see if a copy of FOO.EXE is present on the local
>> network.
>>
>> 3. If yes, copy file from local peers.
>>
>> 4. If no, a file server is "elected" and downloads the file.
>>
>> 5. Remaining machines at site sync from the elected file server.
>>
>>
>>
>> BitTorrent would be an ideal solution, but we can't it for political and
>> technical reasons.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Durf
>>
>>
>>   ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to