There's a flaw in your parenthetical observation.  If the disk fails in a
d2d backup, and the tape is backing up from the backup disk, then the tape
is worthless as far as a secondary backup.


On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Paul Hutchings <[email protected]>wrote:

> Fair point on the flexibility, it just seemed a little costly for a "poor
> mans" solution.
>
> My own personal opinion, stick with an aux copy on tape for that warm fuzzy
> feeling when you're standing in the burning embers and need to know you've
> access to a good backup (or when the disks fail or you mess up) - once the
> d2d backup is done your backup window doesn't matter so you can take as long
> as you like to do the aux copy to tape.
>
> Do check out how BE does dedupe and synthetic full backups - one of the big
> selling points of D2D and dedupe is this "incremental forever" business
> where you take your initial known, good, full backup, and from that point
> onwards you only ever take incrementals and let the backup software
> construct fulls from your initial full, plus the incrementals.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 04 February 2011 19:53
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>  Subject: Re: Dedupe Thoughts?
>
> Yep, definitely would want to exit the tape scene as soon as possible.
>  I was really looking at the Synology for the flexibility of either eSATA
> or NAS connectivity.  There may be even more cost-effective solutions, but
> we've had great luck so far with the one Synology NAS we purchased.
>
>
> Roger Wright
> ___
>
> "The internet is a great way to get on the net." - Bob Dole
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Paul Hutchings <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > How come you're looking at NAS rather than just shovelling a few 2tb
> > drives in your backup server?
> >
> > I'm looking into doing something very similar myself (we use
> > Commvault/Simpana) and the rule of thumb on disk space, assuming
> > you're not paying per Tb stored, is disk is cheap, and with dedupe
> > rates what they are for average data, you'd be mad not to shovel in as
> > much as you can afford and leave tape as the very last resort.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 04 February 2011 18:08
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Dedupe Thoughts?
> >
> > I'm looking at some options for a "poor man's" deduplication system
> > for backups.  A Data Domain or Exagrid solution would be preferred but
> > not feasible at this time.
> >
> > We're currently backing up a little over 4 TB to LTO3 tape and have
> > outgrown our backup window, library capacity, and RTO.
> >
> > I'm thinking of using BE 2010's Deduplication option for the engine
> > and something like the Synology DS1511+ with 5 - 2GB drives for 8 TB
> > of storage (w/RAID5 or just a hot spare).  Then I could offload to
> > tape for off-site storage or script replication to another unit at a
> > branch office.
> >
> > Any best practices thoughts for sizing the storage for the deduped data?
> > Does it just depend on the ratio achieved and the storage and the
> > number of backup sets retained?  One nice thing about the Synology
> > system is it can be easily expanded to up to 15 disks.
> >
> > A Data Domain or Exagrid solution would be preferred but not feasible
> > at this time.
> >
> >
> > Roger Wright
> > ___
> >
> > "The internet is a great way to get on the net." - Bob Dole
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> >
> >
> > --
> > MIRA Ltd
> >
> > Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered
> > in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration  GB 100 1464 84
> >
> > The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use
> of the intended recipient.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax.  You should not
> copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is
> prohibited.
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> >
> >
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to