Someone opens Windows Media Player / iTunes / Media Monkey. If your music 
library is on your SSD, then populating the list of albums and cover art is 
near instantaneous.
Opening the "Recent Item" in Windows 7 (or the Start menu in previous versions) 
is instantaneous
Search in Outlook is instantaneous (as is Windows search)

There are many benefits to just putting everything except the most bulky 
storage onto an SSD. I even put my testing VMs on SSDs now (if I can)

Cheers
Ken

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, 28 March 2011 8:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OTish: SSDs and cool PCs

I would suspect that those of us on this list aren't the standard consumer.
We tend to fall into two types, those who become Luddites at home, and those 
who manage sophisticated infrastructures at home.
I think significant time savings can be gained by having the OS on SSD, the 
other stuff doesn't seem to need the same level of speed, but I could be 
talking out of my hat.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Ken Schaefer 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Fair enough. However it seems that any modern SSD has enough redundancy plus 
resiliency to survive tens of years of consumer use...

Cheers
Ken

From: Rene de Haas [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, 28 March 2011 5:09 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OTish: SSDs and cool PCs

True, I imagine they are trying to make it last longer by not writing to it so 
much.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Ken Schaefer 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Why?

I'd put as much stuff onto the SSD as you can - the performance difference 
between an SSD and a mechanical drive is simply unbelievable.

Cheers
Ken

From: Jonathan Link 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, 25 March 2011 9:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OTish: SSDs and cool PCs

And, I would make it only for the OS, moving the user profile(s) and any 
applications to a standard drive.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Steve Burkett 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Whatever ya do, make sure you get the latest model available of the drive if 
you can, as they're coming on leaps and bounds with the read and write 
performances of these things with each new controller.

For instance the original OCZ Vertex drives could do 230MB/s read & 135MB/s 
writes, the Vertex 2 model for the same price can do 285MB/s read & 275MB/s 
writes, and the Vertex 3 drive that's just been released with the latest 
Sandforce controller can now do up to 500MB/s read and 500MB/s writes.


From: Ames Matthew B (REST) 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: 25 March 2011 10:27

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OTish: SSDs and cool PCs

I have ordered an SSD (I was greedy and went for the 128GB - thing future 
proofing!) for my slightly aging machine.

My plan was to install the OS + Apps onto.  I would then retain my current 
750GB disk for data, temp, profiles, pagefiles, etc.  This I should get fast 
boot/app load but not kill the SSD.  As I run a few VMs I figured the vmdk 
files could reside on the SSD, and the pagefiles for them to be pointed to a 
mechanical disk.



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to