<rant on>

While I really like 2008/2008R2 I'm a bit at a loss trying to understand why
there would be Tasks which would be considered core to the OS even visible.
I'm not a software developer, but why make important scheduled tasks
,strictly designed for the OS, clearly visible to the server admin..

<rant off>



On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Brian Desmond <[email protected]>wrote:

> *If there isn’t a problem they’re causing I wouldn’t go messing with it.
> Much of this stuff is core to the OS and they aren’t likely to have done any
> testing with it turned off…*
>
> * *
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *Brian Desmond*
>
> *[email protected]*
>
> * *
>
> *w – 312.625.1438 | c   – 312.731.3132*
>
> * *
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 12, 2011 5:25 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box
>
>
>
> 2008 R2 seems to have a vast array of pre-configured scheduled tasks. I can
> see the benefit from stuff like the Time Sync, IP address conflict, and Disk
> Defragmenter, but are all the others strictly required? I'm trying to
> streamline Terminal Services boxes and I'm thinking about disabling some of
> these tasks, are there any gotchas I should be aware of?
>
> TIA,
>
>
>
> JRR
>
> --
> "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
> the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
> rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
> a question."
>
> *IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
> addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem,
> no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
> is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an
> irritating social faux pas.
>
> Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context
> somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no
> grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the
> transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on
> borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of
> the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message
> revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice
> from Microsoft.
>
> However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your
> computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have
> received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk
> and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.*
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to