Have you ever compared the costs associated with eFax to a dedicated fax server? Sam is talking thousands of faxes per month.
The last time I did a few years ago with the amount of employees (40) and the amount of faxes received per employee per month, it was cheaper to put in a dedicated fax server. Paid for itself in about 15 months if I remember correctly. After that is was almost free in that regard. Plus it saved them as a PDF and delivered them directly to the right person. -----Original Message----- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 3:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: "Personal" laser printers On 5 May 2011 at 14:06, Sam Cayze wrote: > +1. > Thousands of faxes received here a month. > > >>> Faxing is rare in most environments but there are still a few companies stuck in the 90's. > Unless you know of a way we can more easily have our thousands of independent contractors > send us signed work orders from various retail chains without public computers onsite? Unless you have a burning need for the actual fax hardcopy, I would use eFax for this -- it converts the incoming faxes to PDFs and email them to you. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
