Get them to implement Citrix ICA :-) PCoIP performed *terribly *for us remotely (although that was a couple of years ago)
On 20 June 2011 16:23, Matthew B Ames <[email protected]> wrote: > The company I work for has started rolling out W7 machines, and we are > using DA for our remote connectivity, which as a general rule seems to be > doing exactly what it says on the tin (and it does it pretty well).**** > > ** ** > > However I also use PCoIP to connect to a VDI environment for a network of a > more classified nature, and performance for this – even for screen updates > (typing into Notepad, etc) is pretty terrible.**** > > ** ** > > Rather than getting too into the depths of this (as I am just a user, so I > can’t comment on any network specific settings), I am just wondering if > other people have implemented this and how it fairs for users at home (ADSL > connections, in my case I am syncing around 15meg down, .6 up). I have > tried switching my connectivity between PCoIP and RDP and I have found > virtually no difference. As a sanity check, I have tried using my old > laptop connecting back into the same network via X-Kryptor and performance > is far superior when I launch a remote desktop session (I have tried remote > desktop connections via the PCoIP connection). Therefore I am basically > ruling out my connectivity at home from being part of the problem.**** > > ** ** > > I am a pilot on this system, so it is unlikely that internet connectivity > at the company end is saturated.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > Matt**** > > ** ** > > --** > > *Matthew Ames***** > > Senior Software Engineer, IT Services**** > > MoD Boscombe Down**** > > Tel: 01980 662791, Mobile: 07799 828279**** > > Fax: 01980 664012**** > > Email: [email protected] (work)**** > > [email protected] (home)**** > > ** ** > > QinetiQ - The Global Defence and Security Experts. Delivering customer > focused solutions.**** > > ** ** > > Many hands make a tall horse.**** > > 11 was a race horse, 22 was 12. 1111 race, 22112.**** > > To err is human – to moo, bovine. **** > > ** ** > > Macmillan Cancer Support Charity bike ride – donate > now<http://www.justgiving.com/mba-mac-2011> > **** > > ** ** > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not > the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender > if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor > email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of > security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England & Wales: Company Number: > 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, > Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. > http://www.qinetiq.com > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > -- "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ****** IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER ***** This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress...... * * The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. * * In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets** ** At Home yesterday. * * We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you do get this message then please note that we take no responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from time to time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! * * The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon tea. * ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
