Nu prea relevant la Romania, dar poate interesant la cineva
 
 
1. Extract from Critical Hour

www.earthhealing.info/CH.pdf

Chapter IV

The 1960s: The Bandwagon Market

In December 1963 Jersey Control Power and Light Company purchased, without

federal subsidies, a 5l5 MW BWR to be built on Oyster Creek, New Jersey. The 515 MW

capacity was more than double that of Dresden 1 (200 MW) and Yankee-Rowe (175 MW) and

almost double that of Indian Point (265 MW). General Electric sold the reactor below cost, in

order to demonstrate that nuclear power could compete economically with coal. GE lost an

estimated $30 million on the contract, but the agreement was the turning point in the nuclear

manufacturersÂ’ struggle to gain acceptance by utilities [Ford 1986, pp. 62-63].

General Electric and Westinghouse sold a total of thirteen reactors at cost. They and

other reactor manufacturers also began offering fixed price contracts (subject to increase only

due to inflation) and turnkey contracts (under which the companies provided complete ready-to-operate

power plants rather than simply reactors). [Makhijani and Saleska 1996, pp. 69-70]. The

price cutting by industry substituted for the previous government subsidies (except for the Price

Anderson Act, still in effect today).

 
2.  The nuclear charm offensive

We are all being taken in by a carefully planned public relations strategy. Its
mission: to push nuclear power back on the political agenda, rebranded as the
new "green" alternative.

by Jonathan Leake and Dan Box

New Statesman Cover Story (May 23 2005)

From being a piece of history, the nuclear industry - a fading dinosaur that has wasted billions and left a toxic legacy that will cost billions more - is pushing itself back into the headlines, rebranded as the only source of the cheap, secure and clean energy demanded by modern Britain. The real "green" alternative ...
In briefings around the City, the energy companies have been scaring the captains of British industry silly with warnings of how half Britain's generating capacity - coal as well as nuclear - will have to shut down by 2020.

http://www.newstatesman.co.uk/nscoverstory.htm
 
 
 

3. extract from

Nuclear Power - Myth and Reality

The risks and prospects of

nuclear power

By Gerd Rosenkranz

(page 33)

Since construction officially began in August of 2005, the international nuclear

community has viewed the Olkiluoto 3 project as proof that nuclear energy is a good

investment again, even in a deregulated electricity market. This position should be

viewed with scepticism though since it is unlikely that this type of reactor would have

had a chance under normal competitive conditions.

Funding was made possible by an agreement that compensated the (approximately)

60 shareholders, mainly electrical utilities, by guaranteeing that the electricity

generated by the reactor would be sold at comparatively high prices. TVO and

Framatome ANP also agreed on a fixed price for the finished reactor - "ready for use"

- of 3.2 billion euros. This type of contract, as attractive as it is unusual for the

purchaser, was made possible because Framatome ANP needed a construction

permit at literally any price after more than a decade of development work on the

EPR. Even before the first ground was broken, it was clear that the Areva/Siemens

manufacturing consortium had made extremely tight calculations in order to boost

their prototype reactor ahead of nuclear as well as fossil fuel competitors.

Half a century after entering commercial markets, fuelled by subsidies in the billions, it still requires and

receives state support for every new project - precisely as if it needed assistance to

enter the market for the first time. Astonishingly, this extraordinary practice is also

advocated and demanded by those politicians who otherwise loudly insist on "more

market conditions" in the energy sector. In many industrial countries, these very same

politicians produce market theory arguments to campaign against subsidising the

launch of renewable energy from solar, wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal

sources.

__._,_.___

http://www.nuclearinfo.ro
Va e mai usor sa unsubscribeti de pe acest grup decat sa scapati de efectele unui prost management in domeniul nuclear!:-)
Pentru legislatie si alte informatii utile, vizitati site-ul





SPONSORED LINKS
Science kits Science lab equipment Food science
Science education Science toy

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Raspunde prin e-mail lui