On 18/10/11 10:50, Chris Bevan wrote:
I agree with John.
If others agree too (feel free to express your opinions either way), it
might be worth asking the Nuke team (via Foundry support) if they can
change the way those functions are defined, for clarity, if users agree
that it helps.
[My disclaimer again, for the record: I haven't worked on the Nuke team
for a while now]
There's a whole host of things we're slowly/progressively doing doing to
the DDImage code, but unfortunately we've got higher priorities
(development and bugfixing), so it's slow progress that we're doing in
the background. Explicit requests for it would certainly increase the
priority a bit.
In the meantime, some IDEs (QtCreator and Netbeans (shudder) ) have
options to syntax highlight virtual functions in a certain way, which
makes things a lot easier.
Peter
--
Peter Pearson, Software Engineer
The Foundry, 6th Floor, The Communications Building,
48 Leicester Square, London, UK, WC2H 7LT
Tel: +44 (0)20 7434 0449 Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk
The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd.
Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027
_______________________________________________
Nuke-dev mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev
