hi colin,

is it really that much more intense to do vectorBlur on deep images that it
can bring down a powerful rendernode?
i know that it's not lightweight, but i never thought it might be such a
hardcore task....

Is the tool you are talking about bokeh? we were thinking about buying some
licenses since a long time.....if there would be hidden deepVectorBlur in
it i guess we would buy it right away ;)

regards
Oli



2013/12/10 Colin Doncaster <colin.doncas...@gmail.com>

> Having a product/tool that does this we don’t actually expose the
> functionality because, as you say, even the slightest blur can bring even
> the beefiest machine to it’s knees.
>
> And of course, unless the hider was turned off when the image was rendered
> you’ll still have artifacts...
>
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Steve Newbold <s...@dneg.com> wrote:
>
>  Where would this be used?  Would a deepVectorBlur result in a 'flat'
> image?  In other words, you'd use the deep data to do the blur but the
> result wouldn't be deep?  If you mean a vector blur that blurs and maintain
> the deep data, how would you deal with all the additional samples that get
> created by the filtering?  If you think about it in simpler terms as a
> Gaussian blur, you could blur each of the deep samples but with anything
> but the most tiny value you'd be creating a serious amount of additional
> data.
>
> On top of this, you'd need to generate vectors for each sample.  Its bad
> enough trying to store all the colour data you need without having
> additional channels.
>
> These are the kind of things I was thinking about when I thinking of a
> deepBlur that maintained the deep samples.
>
> Steve
>
>
> On 09/12/13 23:37, Oliver Markowski wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
>  i hope this hasn't been posted before, but a quick search did not show
> anything...
>
>  Does anyone already have a solution for proper deepVectorBlur? Would it
> be easy to do as a simple-plugin or is this more sophisticated?
>
>  Maybe someone from thefoundry could also tell me if this is already on
> their todo list...
>
>  cheers
> Oliver
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-dev mailing listnuke-...@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Nuke-dev mailing list
> Nuke-dev@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-dev mailing list
> Nuke-dev@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-dev mailing list
Nuke-dev@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev

Reply via email to