Yeah thats what i was hoping to do... the question is WHAT is the exact
order nuke calls it in?
has anyone ever tried that sucessfully?

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Steve Booth <[email protected]> wrote:

> An Op is just a class. By Isolation, it can be instantiated and called by
> any other C++ class, but you'd have to call it in exactly the same way Nuke
> does, and you would have to provide definitions for all classes and methods
> it utilizes.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Johannes Saam
> *Sent:* Monday, December 29, 2014 10:46 AM
> *To:* Nuke plug-in development discussion
> *Subject:* [Nuke-dev] Using nukes own ops outside of nuke
>
>
>
> Hey !
>
>
>
> Merry christmas everyone :)
>
> I have a little bit of an RnD theoretical question....
>
> Could we use nuke ops outside nuke? Meaning could i have an Iop input that
> i call validate request and engine on myself and feed it data? And of
> course get the data afterwards? Meaning could i use a nuke blur or even
> better a nuke network and use it to process other data that i specify?
>
> Its  more of a theoretical one but any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Rock on
>
> jo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-dev mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-dev mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev

Reply via email to