Hi all, That's a good question; I've been using the *with *statement as well with success.
I'm curious of what is the best method. Cheers, Justin 2015-11-17 17:24 GMT+00:00 Den Serras <denserras...@gmail.com>: > This leads to a slightly tangential discussion... I used to always use: > > with group: > (inner node stuff) > > which generally seemed to work; but so many people use begin() that now I > play it safe and do: > > with group: > group.begin() > (inner node stuff) > group.end() > > But perhaps someone can explain what the theoretical and functional > differences are between "with group" and "group.begin()", and whether by > combining them I'm causing even more problems... > > Thanks! > Den > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Johan Forsgren <j.a.forsg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Root().begin() worked wonderfully, I had actually no idea that it existed >> at all, thanks! >> >> >> 2015-11-16 18:05 GMT+01:00 Mike Frank <michaeljfr...@gmail.com>: >> >>> nuke.Root().begin() >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-python mailing list >> Nuke-python@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-python >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-python mailing list > Nuke-python@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-python > >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-python mailing list Nuke-python@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-python
