i usuall put a figure of 0.2 and turn the softness button arrow on, to
achieve any sort of usable brush...



On 30 August 2011 12:47, Johan Boije <[email protected]> wrote:
> Second the experience you have with opacity and hardness settings having to
> be in the lower .x to .0x area to get something that is a nice default. Also
> get the feeling that .5 isn't the equivalent of 50%, weird?
> On 30 aug 2011, at 11:36, J Bills <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> would love to see this feature added.  usually it's just adding a modifier
> to whatever it is for size while clicking+dragging. like if it's shift, you
> would just tack on crtl after setting the size and then set your hardness.
>
> while we're being constructive, does anyone find the opacity setting really
> heavy?
>
> a lot of times, to get nice feathery clone strokes, I have to set the
> opacity setting to like .1 or .05 (!!) to get what might be a 30-40% setting
> in another app.  seems like it's on some sort of strange logarithmic scale
> or something.  .5 is definitely not 50% of what 1 is.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> That doesn't seem to be working particularly noticeably for me, plus it
>> would be nice to get a visual, set it and forget it - it's reassuring...or
>> maybe it's just the case that old UI habits die hard?  AE does this too,
>> works nice.
>>
>>
>> On 29 August 2011 14:45, Nathan Hackett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you use a wacom, you can use the downward arrow button (next to
>>> hardness etc) and then it becomes pressure sensitive, like the brush tool in
>>> photoshop.
>>> n
>>>
>>> Michael Garrett wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm still not that familiar with paint in Nuke, but it seems there is no
>>>> method to interactively set the brush feather size like in say, Commotion.
>>>>  I think this corresponds with the "hardness" value.  Is there a way to do
>>>> this?  Otherwise I'll put in a feature request.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to