I've often wanted this, too. There must be a feature request already, I bet. You should email [email protected]. -Ean
P.S. 'Feather/falloff' are different but also useful and should remain. On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Silwerfeldt <[email protected]>wrote: > Super thanks alot for your asnwers and yes the Blur and dilate/erode > shoould definately be inside the mask option. > > I will play around more with Nukes CC – thanks for the tips. > > Cheers > Daniel > > *From:* ROBERT JACKSON <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:12 PM > *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Soft mask and color correct > > funny you say that, > > more & more I am using a blur node to create a soft edge ( & I mean soft,) > > playing with feather & feather falloff is not really intuitive, > > as you can end up with splines that are so far removed from the roto shape > > that adjustments become a real headache. > > Have found it to be good for minute adjustments though... > > Should for sure be offered up inside the node > > ------------------------------ > *From:* J Bills <[email protected]> > *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, 27 September 2011, 20:30 > *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Soft mask and color correct > > yes, as said you're probably looking for just a straight up blur, > which is different from feather and falloff - shame it's not built > right into the node. with the addition of multiple shapes per node in > nuke 6.x, it would be helpful to have blur and dilate/erode per shape > rather than having to do those effects globally after the fact. > > the ColorCorrect node in nuke is actually quite well set up, and you > might grow to love it. My guess is you've not played with the splits > between shadow/mid/high (ranges tab). If you choke up on your falloff > between your splits, you might be able to get more separate control > you're looking in, for example, the shadows without pushing too much > into the mids. > > keep in mind different footage will respond differently - ie the > shadow and highlight values are rarely in the same range. that said, > I rarely use the default ranges when using CC. your first move with > that should always be to quickly set the ranges using the test > utility, then color correct after that. > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:38 AM, michael vorberg > <[email protected]> wrote: > > for the colorcorrect behaviour: > > > > if you used fusions colorwheel to change the color then you did a > tinting. > > thats a diffrent method than changing the gain > > i tend to use the TMI (Temperature Magenta Intensity) sliders in nukes > color > > tools. if go to a cooler (blue) tone it compensates the other colors to > keep > > the luminance > > > > greetings, > > > > michael > > > > > > > >> Hi > >> > >> I惴 trying to make really soft mask with the roto tool, but I still get a > >> very hard edge I think. I扉e tried the playing with feather (obviously) > and > >> even cranked that upp to 500 and also tried Linear, smooth, smooth1 and > >> smooth0, but still I don愒 get the soft mask I want. I miss the matte > tool > >> from Fusion.. I can愒 mimic those masks in Nuke -yet. I guess I am > missing > >> something. > >> > >> Also I惴 not fully understand the Colorcorrect in Nuke vs Fusion Color > >> Corrector. > >> > >> 1) If I want to add more blue in the shadow areas for example.. in > Fusion > >> I just choose shadow and add in more blue without changing the luminance > of > >> the shadow area just the color. In nuke when I gain in blue color I > always > >> change the luminance and have to compensate that... > >> > >> 2) Are there any similar tool like the levels in Fusion Color corrector > >> with all, shadow, middle and high愀 easily changed seperately. I have > used > >> the Nuke Histogram together with luma keys.. > >> > >> I don愒 want to start any Fusion vs Nuke rant.. I really like both > programs > >> and I use them both depending on the studios I work for. > >> > >> cheers > >> Daniel > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Nuke-users mailing list > >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Nuke-users mailing list > > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > ------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
