Ah it is limited to HD.  

I never really looked because I have the full package. 

On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Diogo Girondi wrote:

> Isn't Resolve Lite also limited to 1920x1080?
> 
> Cheers,
> Diogo
> 
> On 27/10/2011, at 20:16, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah resolve with only 2 nodes per cut.  so like you can do a one light for 
>> free.  So pretty much storm for free.  
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 27, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Simon Blackledge wrote:
>> 
>>> Resolve lite?
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 27 Oct 2011, at 21:37, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> maybe Hiero will come to the rescue?!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Holger Hummel|Celluloid VFX wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> although this is not really good news, at least it's nice to be assured 
>>>>> that it obviously wasn't our fault that we simply couldn't get it to work 
>>>>> properly - apart from the fact that the only machine it did not 
>>>>> constantly crash on was a mac, all kinds of windows flavours were a no-go.
>>>>> really questionable policy to give away free software that in the end 
>>>>> costs you a lot of time and nerves and still doesn't give you what you 
>>>>> need.
>>>>> we ended up using premiere for it. for what we needed (and there was no 
>>>>> color-accuracy involved) it did a nice job and just worked. on top of it 
>>>>> you get the kind of data/project management you can expect from an 
>>>>> editing app. and i'm pretty sure, once set up properly you will get the 
>>>>> color out of its dpx export that you expect.
>>>>> guess, we'll have a look into the rubber chimp here, too. but it looks 
>>>>> like this is only helping if you have the timecodes of the footage, 
>>>>> though. is that correct? otherwise you still need to have an app where 
>>>>> you can look at the footage and mark in/out, right? unfortunately this 
>>>>> was necessary on a project we needed to convert some r3d files ourselves.
>>>>> brave new digital cinema world....
>>>>> 
>>>>> Holger
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Frank Rueter wrote:
>>>>>> ha.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just an update for those who are interested:
>>>>>> After playing with RedCinePro a bit longer I've decided it's a piece of 
>>>>>> poo and will probably invest into MonkeyExtract next time around 
>>>>>> (especially seeing the developer lives on the same peninsula, haha).
>>>>>> RedCine seems to output unreliable frame ranges and also an 
>>>>>> unpredictable mess of file/folder naming, in other words when loading 
>>>>>> and exporting the same exact project multiple times I never once got the 
>>>>>> same output.
>>>>>> While the software itself is free, it's unreliability has already cost 
>>>>>> me almost a day worth of work so it got expensive quite quickly :-D
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Randy Little wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ha no one owes you more then I do Frank.   :-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Randy S. Little
>>>>>>> http://www.rslittle.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 21:43, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> thanks a lot for the offer Asa but using the REDLogFilm "look" seems 
>>>>>>>> to do
>>>>>>>> the trick.
>>>>>>>> thanks everyone for your input, much appreciated.
>>>>>>>> frank
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Oct 25, 2011, at 4:15 PM, asa hammond wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you kick me an edl I can kick you back a script to run using 
>>>>>>>> redline if
>>>>>>>> you want to go that way, I have tools that support Fcp and cmx edls 
>>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>> owe you at least one favor for the knowledge you have dropped on us 
>>>>>>>> nukers
>>>>>>>> over the years.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Asa
>>>>>>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> RedCine is free ;)
>>>>>>>> On Oct 25, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Bill Gilman wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You can try this:
>>>>>>>> http://www.rubbermonkeysoftware.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:36 PM, Frank Rueter wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sorry for the OT, but does anyone have experience with this thing?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to export some proper log dpx files but there don't seem to 
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> any options in the export dialog and the default dpx output seems to 
>>>>>>>> be in
>>>>>>>> sRGB which sucks balls.
>>>>>>>> I need to go through RedCine as I need to transcode based on edlx, 
>>>>>>>> otherwise
>>>>>>>> I could just pull it into NUke, but that will take me ages.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Any tips would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> frank
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Holger Hummel  -  [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Celluloid Visual Effects, Paul-Lincke-Ufer 39/40, 10999 Berlin
>>>>> phone +49 (0)30 / 54 735 220  -  [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to