Thanks for the feedback guys. > I agree with Howard. Some points there are so simplistic that can be > misleading or simply plain wrong depending on how you look at them.
My problem is that Nuke is very forgiving of bad practice and my students (undergrads) can mistake this for a blanket permission to do anything they like. When one is correcting for the 100th time in a week a badly set format in Project Settings, then one looses the desire to frame ones advice in negotiable terms. However, I see your point. I have removed some of the points, softened my line on others and placed the page within a broader context as a sub-page in the 'Script Evaluation' page. http://opticalenquiry.com/nuke/index.php?title=Script_Evaluation It is still a bit rough but I hope to have it in acceptable form by the start of the semester. On 23-Dec-2011, at 3:37 AM, Diogo Girondi wrote: > I agree with Howard. Some points there are so simplistic that can be > misleading or simply plain wrong depending on how you look at them. > > diogo > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe - I'd scrap your dont's - far too simplistic > > Howard > > From: Jd Flame <[email protected]> > To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2011, 15:47 > Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] New Nuke training Wiki > > This is great!!! > > Thank you Martin for sharing all this information with us. > > JD > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:13 AM, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Nuke mailing list denizens, > > > > I have just finished the first working draft of a Wiki dedicated to Nuke > > learning. It was made to accompany my class on Digital Compositing, here in > > Singapore. > > > > http://opticalenquiry.com/nuke/ > > > > The philosophy of this Wiki is to augment hands on classroom teaching (I > > have tried to illustrate points with code snippets as well as screen > > shots). I have paid particular attention to points that I know confuse the > > newbie and have left out details that I think are best covered by the user > > guide. > > > > Any feedback greatly welcome. It is still a bit thin on screen shots and > > rampant with typos. It might also contain inaccuracies as I am a bit of a > > Nuke newbie myself. > > > > I will be happy to accommodate anyone interested in having editing > > privileges. > > > > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > > Nuke-users mailing list > > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
