On 24 feb 2012, at 19:38, Randy Little wrote:
He didn't say shake was responsive. He said it wasn't. Seeing how
restoration tools are now $1500 from Black Magic. Its cheaper then
Furnace.
I was saying that when you are looking at a film-restoration pipeline
you want to have a system where
responsive playback comes first, and compositing functionality second.
These priorities are also usually
accounted for in the design of the software (ie Flame does not upgrade
the pixel buffer bit depth unless
explicitly asked to do so leading to constraining the datarate to
maintain playback at all times).
--
Julik Tarkhanov | HecticElectric | Keizersgracht 736 1017 EX
Amsterdam | The Netherlands | tel. +31 20 330 8250
cel. +31 61 145 06 36 | http://hecticelectric.nl
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
