Sorry, missed that in the deluge of emails on this topic. Was just trying to 
help.

On May 30, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Howard Jones wrote:

> As mentioned a couple of times, this one was sent by mistake and the one 
> involving crop factors being the more accurate scenario. By all means keep 
> picking faults in this email if you wish.
> 
> From: Joe Laude <[email protected]>; 
> To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>; 
> Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Arri Alexa sensor size - camera tracking question 
> Sent: Wed, May 30, 2012 6:05:08 AM 
> 
> I have no idea how you could have come across two 500mm lenses, except one 
> isn't really a 500mm. If you have a moment, send a link to the product's page 
> on Adorama or B&H or Amazon or wherever you like, so I can see what you're 
> looking at, because I have never seen a "full-frame-equivalent focal length" 
> used in place of the actual focal length of a lens. Canon doesn't, and I 
> suspect Nikon doesn't either.
> 
> On May 29, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Howard Jones wrote:
> 
>> Ok then explain to me why I have a 500 mm lens that fits my Nikon that will 
>> give the same as a 750mm lens designed for the camera. The sensor has 
>> cropped the image coming through the back of the lens and effectively 
>> changed the focal length. 
>> 
>> I can buy a 500mm lens designed for my camera and that will give me the 
>> field of view of a 500mm. 
>> 
>> So I now can have 2 500 mm lenses on the same camera but with completely 
>> different results depending on which one I use. 
>> 
>> I assume I'm missing something here, but as there are 2 lens types available 
>> for my camera, one designed for it and one that happens to use the same 
>> mount both 500mm isn't there 2 possible results from a '500mm ' lens?
>> 
>> It's this scenario I'm talking about, and I believe the one that has sparked 
>> the thread in the first place. 
>> 
>> H
>> 
>> From: Joe Laude <[email protected]>; 
>> To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>; 
>> Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Arri Alexa sensor size - camera tracking question 
>> Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 9:50:20 AM 
>> 
>> Alex is correct. The cone of light coming through the lens doesn't change 
>> because of the sensor. The sensor determines how much of that light is 
>> recorded as an image, but an 18 is an 18 on any sensor. A bigger sensor will 
>> give you a wider fov when you're shooting, but that's irrelevant to the 
>> figures you put into Nuke after it's been shot. The lens is still an 18mm 
>> lens, and you don't need to convert it to something else.
>> 
>> Joe Laude
>> (507) 251-7006
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On May 29, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Alex Fry <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> It doesn't matter what sensor the lens is designed for, it's focal length 
>>> remains the same. It is what it is.
>>> 
>>> What are you basing 27mm on? A crop factor of 1.5? Relative to what? A 35mm 
>>> still camera?
>>> 
>>> 35mm stills equivalent focal length descriptions should have no place in a 
>>> discussion about tracking footage from a movie camera, they only exist as a 
>>> crutch for stills photographers who grew up using their focal lengths as 
>>> working slang to describe a particular field of view.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 29/05/2012, at 6:23 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'd agree with Randy here. If the 18mm prime is not designed for the film 
>>>> back then it would have an equivalent focal length of, in your example of 
>>>> 27mm (though that is just based on your example. )
>>>> 
>>>> However if it is a prime lens designed for the chip, then it is an 18mm 
>>>> lens, so no conversion necessary. 
>>>> 
>>>> However again, the solve you would get should work either way, but the 
>>>> relation between the point cloud and camera will vary and will begin to be 
>>>> an issue for objects that should be close to the camera. 
>>>> 
>>>> That is you can double a focal length and move an object twice as far away 
>>>> in nuke and it should look the same, except for objects very close, when 
>>>> distortion artefacts creep in, and I don't mean lens distortion 
>>>> characteristics here before any one jumps in, I mean if you stick a sphere 
>>>> right next to the lens and have a super wide angle, that isn't the same as 
>>>> an object further away with say a standard lens size. (eg 50mm for 35)
>>>> 
>>>> So you can track and try 2 solves with 2 different lens lengths, and if 
>>>> there are objects close to camera you should see a difference in shape of 
>>>> any test spheres etc, otherwise it should still lock. 
>>>> 
>>>> I couldn't find anything quickly online to confirm your film back sizes, 
>>>> but someone has created a whole set of presets for cameras (Nathan?) which 
>>>> are very useful on nukepedia. 
>>>> 
>>>> H
>>>> 
>>>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
>>>> To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>; 
>>>> Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Arri Alexa sensor size - camera tracking 
>>>> question 
>>>> Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 7:21:12 AM 
>>>> 
>>>> He is right.   
>>>> 
>>>> T-Mobile. America’s First Nationwide 4G Network
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Reply message -----
>>>> From: "Darren Coombes" <[email protected]>
>>>> To: "Nuke user discussion" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: [Nuke-users] Arri Alexa sensor size - camera tracking question
>>>> Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 01:01
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the reply Alex, I'll have a look. We have someone here saying 
>>>> that the 18mm lens would not be an 18mm lens in our tracker settings, I 
>>>> just want to make sure what they are saying is right.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers.
>>>> D.
>>>> 
>>>> On 29/05/2012, at 4:57 PM, Alex Fry wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The "crop factor" is described by the sensor measurements you input.
>>>>> Your 18mm lens is still 18mm, no conversion is necessary, your field of 
>>>>> view has changed, but not your focal length..
>>>>> An 18mm lens has a different field of view if its mounted on micro4/3, 
>>>>> DX, super35, 35 stills, 70mm or medium format, but it remains an 18mm 
>>>>> lens.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Have a play with Nuke's camera node, tweaking the focal length, haperture 
>>>>> & vaperture knobs to get a feel for the relationship they have to each 
>>>>> other.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 29/05/2012, at 4:27 PM, Darren Coombes 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi, we have some plates shot with the alexa on a 18mm prime lens.
>>>>>> I Need to camera track this material.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On the Arri website, it says the sensor size for the alexa is 23.76 x 
>>>>>> 13.37mm when using the ARRIRAW setting with 1.78:1 aspect ratio.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> in the camera tracker settings, would I put the film back size as 23.76 
>>>>>> x 13.37mm?
>>>>>> And then I guess i need to find out the crop factor for that sensor size 
>>>>>> and use that when entering the focal length of the lens?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So if we shot on a 18mm lens, and theoretically the crop factor was 1.5 
>>>>>> (not sure what the actual crop factor is yet), you would times 18 x1.5? 
>>>>>> and that would give the right focal length?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can someone point me in the right direction with this? and is my theory 
>>>>>> of this right? or am i missing something?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Darren.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Darren Coombes
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Compositor
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> www.resolutiondesign.com.au 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> resolution:  sydney australia   tel: +61 2 9360 9908             fax: 
>>>>>> +61 2 9360 8908         
>>>>>> 22 burton st: east sydney: 2010 post office box: 614 darlinghurst: 1300  
>>>>>>  abn: 3305 196 1856
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2010 Silver One Show Entertainment Award: Online Branded Entertainment 
>>>>>> 2009 Gold Promax/BDA Award: Best Broadcast Design Image Spot  
>>>>>> 2009 Winner Creative Review Hotshop Award: Post Production / VFX
>>>>>> 2009 Finalist Creative Review Hotshop Award: Broadcast Design
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The information transmitted, together with the attachments, is intended 
>>>>>> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain  
>>>>>> confidential and/or priviliged material which may be subject to 
>>>>>> copyright. Any review, retransmission or other use of, or taking of any 
>>>>>> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other 
>>>>>> than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in 
>>>>>> error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any 
>>>>>> computer or network. No warranty is given by the sender that any 
>>>>>> attachments to this email are free from viruses or other defects. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <Unknown.jpeg>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>> 
>>>> Darren Coombes
>>>> Compositor
>>>> 
>>>> www.resolutiondesign.com.au 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> resolution:  sydney australia   tel: +61 2 9360 9908             fax: +61 
>>>> 2 9360 8908         
>>>> 22 burton st: east sydney: 2010 post office box: 614 darlinghurst: 1300   
>>>> abn: 3305 196 1856
>>>> 
>>>> 2010 Silver One Show Entertainment Award: Online Branded Entertainment 
>>>> 2009 Gold Promax/BDA Award: Best Broadcast Design Image Spot  
>>>> 2009 Winner Creative Review Hotshop Award: Post Production / VFX
>>>> 2009 Finalist Creative Review Hotshop Award: Broadcast Design
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The information transmitted, together with the attachments, is intended 
>>>> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain  
>>>> confidential and/or priviliged material which may be subject to copyright. 
>>>> Any review, retransmission or other use of, or taking of any action in 
>>>> reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
>>>> intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please 
>>>> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer or network. 
>>>> No warranty is given by the sender that any attachments to this email are 
>>>> free from viruses or other defects. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> <image.png>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to