m agree with howard .. ... reformat is better for that..
cheers.............. ;) On 9/3/12, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes but reformat would be the better choice if you don't mind raterising. > > The advantage of scaling the rotos in the node is it gives cleaner results. > > > Howard > > On 3 Sep 2012, at 15:38, crunch fx <[email protected]> wrote: > >> or u can use transform ... >> ;) >> >> On 9/3/12, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >>> That is as expected. It doesnt apply a reformat, but sets the working >>> area, >>> so as your rotos were done at 1280, then they will work from 0,0 to >>> 1280,720(?) >>> >>> You can add a reformat after or select all rotos, go to transform tab >>> and >>> set origin to 0,0 and scale by 1920/720. >>> >>> When there is a bg input this overrides the format option. >>> >>> >>> Howard >>> >>> On 3 Sep 2012, at 14:25, Johannes Hezer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi List, >>>> >>>> I hope this is an easy one, I cant figure out how to tell Nuke that my >>>> Rotos should scale according to the format coming in ? >>>> >>>> We had a shot done in 1280 and now switched to 1920... >>>> All Rotos stay in the 1280 area of the image left lower corner instead >>>> of >>>> scaling proportionally ?! >>>> >>>> Is that normal ? >>>> I know that I have to touch all Blurs and Feathers by hand anyway, but >>>> how >>>> can I "scale" my rotos ? >>>> >>>> There are some rotos I can "reformat" (with a reformat node )but some >>>> are >>>> in the flow and cant be "reformatted"... >>>> >>>> Changing the format in the roto node does not do anything when there is >>>> a >>>> bg in the Roto already ?! >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> j >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
