nuke is pretty much terrible at motion graphics. but then again, AE is pretty much terrible at VFX.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Craig Tozzi <[email protected]> wrote: > You certainly can, but Nuke doesn't have a few things that are nice to > have for graphic work: > > - timelines with multiple shots / scenes. > - multitudes of plug-ins / scripts that cater a bit more to the mograph > side > - a large mograph user base / community for AE. > > We swap between AE and Nuke all the time, but 90% of the graphic stuff is > done in AE. > > On Sep 14, 2012, at 11:22 AM, "emersontg" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Is it possible to use Nuke for motion graphics instead After Effects? I > mean, may I do anything (particles, animated text etc) in Nuke that I do in > After effects? or Nuke is for composition only...Anyone can explain the > main diferences? > > thanks in advance > > emerson > > _______________________________________________ > > Nuke-users mailing list > > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
