Yeah, but what discombobulates me is why 66? Someone 10 years ago decided to write "if samples < 66 then ....."? And noones bothered to change it?
I do agree though. Nukes scanline renderer (everything 3d, really) is pretty useless. Unfortunately (as suggested above) that is the renderer I am stuck with at the moment, can not use atomkraft. G On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jonathan Egstad <[email protected]>wrote: > Because that's the maximum number of jitter samples in the hardcoded > internal jitter array. Ten years ago it didn't seem necessary to go beyond > that, however now it's pretty limiting. > > The real answer is to completely replace the sampling schema in the > renderer with a more modern stochastic one. > Better yet, replace the whole renderer with a proper ray tracer... > > -jonathan > > On Mar 1, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Gustaf Nilsson wrote: > > Just want to add that the limit seems to be 66 samples. How does that make > sense?? > > G > On 1 Mar 2013 23:24, "Gustaf Nilsson" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah that would be ace if it wasn't for the fact that i need the samples >> on animated textures and i have multiple semi transparent objects >> >> Thanks, G >> On 1 Mar 2013 19:25, "Marten Blumen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You can use VectorBlur after the Scanline to add more motion blur, this >>> smoothes the 60/70 samples 'limit'. >>> >>> Page 444 of the Nuke 7.04 User Guide explains it well - 'Adding Motion >>> Blur Using VectorBlur' >>> >>> >>> On 2 March 2013 03:26, Gustaf Nilsson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> seems like the max amount of moblur samples is somewhere between 60 and >>>> 70, is there a reason for that? Is there a way to hack beyond that? >>>> >>>> (other than doing two renders with an offset of the motionblur and >>>> combine them after) >>>> >>>> G >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > -- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
