And the sand force chips has a name for being unreliable -------------------------------------------------- Matan Arbel Motion/Graphic Designer matanarbel.com
On Mar 30, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Simon Blackledge <[email protected]> wrote: > Why non-sandforce for compressed data? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 30 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Awesome, I guess that will be my next test then ;) >> >> Thanks Chris! >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:47 AM, chris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> if you're on a budget you can also hook up two consumer SSDs to some >>> SATAIII ports and raid them... you can get 500GB of insanely fast local for >>> under 300bucks this way (and 1TB for about 600). >>> >>> i've got over 900MB/sec sequential read/writes with with two Agility3 240GB >>> as RAID0 on a the i7 motherboard controller - flies with DPX. (if you have >>> more random read/writes or compressed data like EXR then a non-sandforce >>> SSD like the Samsung 840 Pro might have some advantages - but even cheap >>> SSDs are incredibly fast with sequential operations these days) >>> >>> ++ chris >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
