Yeah I think they are both a bit price heavy.  Both doing well, what about
Electric Image?  It probably needs a new home but its got a solid
foundation to move its aged bones alone.


Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/



On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Diogo Girondi <diogogiro...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I wish Softimage XSI was still available for them to buy. They certainly
> would have a done a much better job than what Autodesk did. Houdini doesn't
> look like the kind of app they would consider, but Maxon's Cinema 4D on the
> other hand could be a candidate if that is something on their radar.
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Randy Little <randyslit...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hmm what 3d package is on their radar? It would seem to be a logical next
>> step.
>> On Sep 12, 2014 5:29 AM, "Arno Beekman" <n...@rgbaz.eu> wrote:
>>
>>>  yeah and a native Linux version...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If Petty is as smart as he's always been, I guess he'd put Fusion inside
>>> Resolve... then buy Lightworks and replace Resolve's editor with it.
>>> add python access to the complete core and let the community do the rest
>>> ;)
>>> Of course it will be very cheap, so it'll be a fantastic tool for
>>> preproduction.
>>> There'll be a hole new generation of filmmakers. People that start with
>>> "post"production while writing the script...
>>>
>>> yay!
>>>
>>>
>>> </dream>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12-09-14 11:05, Ron Ganbar wrote:
>>>
>>> Fusion for Mac...?
>>> On Sep 12, 2014 11:45 AM, "David Yu" <dave...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Free fusion with a purchase of Decklink card?
>>>> Fusion for 500 usd? :)
>>>>
>>>> I think is great news for compositing community unless they kill it.
>>>> On Sep 12, 2014 4:16 PM, "Arno Beekman" <n...@rgbaz.eu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> any thoughts on this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.redsharknews.com/post/item/2015-blackmagic-s-purchase-of-eyeon-fusion-will-send-shockwaves-through-the-post-production-industry
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing listnuke-us...@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to